THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO NUTRITION MODELS, NRC (2001) AND CNCPS V.6.1, IN ESTIMATING NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF FRESH COWS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AMANLOU HAMID; SHAFIEI HADI; AMIRABADI FARAHANI TAHERE; KHEIRI FARSHID; ESLAMIAN FARSUNI NAJME

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Journal of Animal Production Year:2016 | Volume:18 | Issue:1 Page(s): 27-38

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

2,435

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO NUTRITION MODELS, NRC (2001) AND CNCPS V.6.1, IN ESTIMATING NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF FRESH COWS

Author(s)

Keywords

DRY MATTER INTAKEQ2

ENERGY ALLOWABLE MILKQ2

HOLSTEIN COWQ2

MEAN BIASQ2

MP ALLOWABLE MILKQ2

Abstract

In order to compare the precision of predictions of NRC (2001) and CNCPS models, 17 Holstein fresh cows were assigned in a randomized complete block design to a balanced diet with NRC (2001) and CNCPS software. The predicted DMI, ENERGY ALLOWABLE MILK and protein allowable milk by both models were compared with observed values. The precision of the predictions of models was evaluated by calculation of R2, MEAN BIAS and root mean square prediction error (RMSPE). Both models predicted DMI lower than the observed values (P<0.01). The MEAN BIAS, RMSPE and R2 were 2.22, 2.84 and 0.48 for NRC (2001) and 3.18, 3.99 and 0.52 for CNCPS, respectively and CNCPS predicted the DMI 20 percent lower than the observed value. The observed milk production was 29.78 kg/d. predicted ENERGY ALLOWABLE MILK by NRC (2001) and CNCPS were 25.68 and 22.32 kg/d, respectively. Predicted protein allowable milk with NRC (2001) and CNCPS were 25.80 and 28.37 kg/d, respectively and NRC (2001) predicted the milk production 14 percent lower than observed value. Given the importance of DMI in fresh cows seems NRC (2001) has more precision compared to CNCPS for estimating nutritional requirements.

Cites

No record.

References

EFFECT OF CALCIUM BOROGLUCONATE INJECTION PRE AND IMMEDIATELY POSTPARTUM ON PRODUCTION PERFORMANCE, INCIDENCE OF METABOLIC DISORDERS AND SITUATION OF THE UTERUS AFTER CALVING IN COWS FED ANIONIC DIETS

Cite

APA: Copy

AMANLOU, HAMID, SHAFIEI, HADI, AMIRABADI FARAHANI, TAHERE, KHEIRI, FARSHID, & ESLAMIAN FARSUNI, NAJME. (2016). THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO NUTRITION MODELS, NRC (2001) AND CNCPS V.6.1, IN ESTIMATING NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF FRESH COWS. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PRODUCTION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE), 18(1), 27-38. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/209160/en

Vancouver: Copy

AMANLOU HAMID, SHAFIEI HADI, AMIRABADI FARAHANI TAHERE, KHEIRI FARSHID, ESLAMIAN FARSUNI NAJME. THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO NUTRITION MODELS, NRC (2001) AND CNCPS V.6.1, IN ESTIMATING NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF FRESH COWS. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PRODUCTION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE)[Internet]. 2016;18(1):27-38. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/209160/en

IEEE: Copy

HAMID AMANLOU, HADI SHAFIEI, TAHERE AMIRABADI FARAHANI, FARSHID KHEIRI, and NAJME ESLAMIAN FARSUNI, “THE COMPARISON BETWEEN TWO NUTRITION MODELS, NRC (2001) AND CNCPS V.6.1, IN ESTIMATING NUTRITIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF FRESH COWS,” JOURNAL OF ANIMAL PRODUCTION (JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURE), vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 27–38, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/209160/en

Related Journal Papers