COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF AWBM, SACRAMENTO, SIMHYD, SMAR AND TANK

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ROSTAMI KHALAJ M.; MOGHADAMNIA A.R.; SALMANI H.; SEPAHVAND A.R.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS OF IRAN Year:2016 | Volume:7 | Issue:2 Page(s): 47-63

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,281

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF AWBM, SACRAMENTO, SIMHYD, SMAR AND TANK

Author(s)

ROSTAMI KHALAJ M. | MOGHADAMNIA A.R. | SALMANI H. | SEPAHVAND A.R. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NODEH WATERSHEDQ1

RRLQ1

CONCEPTUAL MODELQ3

AWBM MODELQ1

SMAR MODELQ1

Abstract

Rainfall Runoff models is an important tool in the study of water management of the watershed Different hydrologic processes such as: infiltration, soil storage, percolation, and groundwater storage are considered to simulate runoff from the catchment in Rainfall Runoff model. Because the possibility of measurement all parameters needed to evaluate watershed response is impossible, evaluate performance of a model with simple structure and using minimal input that can provide an acceptable prediction of hydrological processes, is too necessary. Purpose of this study is compare the performance of AWBM, Sacramento, SimHyd, SMAR and Tank rainfall - runoff models to simulate runoff from the NODEH WATERSHED in Golestan Province. The types of these models are conceptual lumped models that are in RRL with 8 calibration optimisers, the model inputs include daily precipitation, daily evapotranspiration and daily runoff values of the basin. Results showed that pattern search among other calibration optimisers provide better results. AWBM MODEL with Nash coefficient of 0.71 for calibration and 0.63 for the evaluation have best performance among the models and the SMAR MODEL with Nash coefficient of 0.417 and 0.338 respectively for calibration and evaluation periods among models that considered in this study have lowest performance. Also investigated models are not ability to simulate minimum and maximum values but the average values are acceptable simulation, since this model does not require much input data and their use does not require time-consuming and costly these models can be used according to the needs in water resources management.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ROSTAMI KHALAJ, M., MOGHADAMNIA, A.R., SALMANI, H., & SEPAHVAND, A.R.. (2016). COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF AWBM, SACRAMENTO, SIMHYD, SMAR AND TANK. NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS OF IRAN, 7(2), 47-63. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/215110/en

Vancouver: Copy

ROSTAMI KHALAJ M., MOGHADAMNIA A.R., SALMANI H., SEPAHVAND A.R.. COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF AWBM, SACRAMENTO, SIMHYD, SMAR AND TANK. NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS OF IRAN[Internet]. 2016;7(2):47-63. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/215110/en

IEEE: Copy

M. ROSTAMI KHALAJ, A.R. MOGHADAMNIA, H. SALMANI, and A.R. SEPAHVAND, “COMPARE THE PERFORMANCE OF AWBM, SACRAMENTO, SIMHYD, SMAR AND TANK,” NATURAL ECOSYSTEMS OF IRAN, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 47–63, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/215110/en

Related Journal Papers