COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CD AND ZN UPTAKE BY TWO EUCALYPTUS SPECIES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

DEHGHAN M.; MOSHKI A.; MOLLASHAHI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Forests and Rangelands Protection Research Year:2016 | Volume:14 | Issue:1 Page(s): 22-33

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

905

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CD AND ZN UPTAKE BY TWO EUCALYPTUS SPECIES

Author(s)

DEHGHAN M. | MOSHKI A. | MOLLASHAHI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

EUCALYPTUS MICROTHECAQ2

EUCALYPTUS CAMALDULENSISQ2

HEAVY METALSQ2

POLLUTIONQ1

PHYTOREMEDIATIONQ2

Abstract

Nowadays, PHYTOREMEDIATION is considered as a new technique to remove a variety of contaminants from the environment. The present study was conducted to evaluate and compare the uptake rate of HEAVY METALS such as cadmium and zinc by two species of eucalypt including EUCALYPTUS MICROTHECA and E. camaldulensis. For this purpose, the uniform 6-months seedlings of Eucalyptus were selected from the nursery of Golestan agricultural and natural resources research and education center. Eighteen seedlings of each E. microtheca and E. camaldulensis species were subjected to the HEAVY METALS treatment, three concentrations for each elements of Cd (5, 10, 15 ppm) and Zn (1, 3, 10 ppm). In total108 samples were taken from leaf, root and stem of each seedling in three replicates. Dry acid digestion method was used for samples extraction. The concentrations of HEAVY METALS in the samples were measured using ICP-OES. The results revealed that Zn content significantly differs between leaves and roots of two species with an average of 518.6, 426.5 for leaves and 476.2, 382.2 for roots in E. microtheca and E. camaldulensis, respectively. In contrast, there was no significant difference between stems of two species in terms of Zn content. Furthermore, Cd content in leaves and roots of two species showed significant differences with an average of 124.9, 179.7 for leaves and 435.8, 399.7 (unit?) for roots, respectively. Under low concentration of HEAVY METALS in the soil, no significant difference was observed between two species. However, increasing heavy metal concentration in soil (Zn from 1 to 3 mM and Cd from 10 to 15 mM) demonstrated higher efficiency in E. microtheca rather than E. camaldulensis. These findings suggest that in general, in the wide use of two mentioned eucalyptus species in forestation projects for PHYTOREMEDIATION, the E. microtheca would have higher efficiency than E. camaldulensis in terms of Cd and Zn absorption.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

DEHGHAN, M., MOSHKI, A., & MOLLASHAHI, M.. (2016). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CD AND ZN UPTAKE BY TWO EUCALYPTUS SPECIES. FOREST AND RANGE PROTECTION RESEARCH, 14(1), 22-33. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/227817/en

Vancouver: Copy

DEHGHAN M., MOSHKI A., MOLLASHAHI M.. COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CD AND ZN UPTAKE BY TWO EUCALYPTUS SPECIES. FOREST AND RANGE PROTECTION RESEARCH[Internet]. 2016;14(1):22-33. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/227817/en

IEEE: Copy

M. DEHGHAN, A. MOSHKI, and M. MOLLASHAHI, “COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF CD AND ZN UPTAKE BY TWO EUCALYPTUS SPECIES,” FOREST AND RANGE PROTECTION RESEARCH, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 22–33, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/227817/en

Related Journal Papers