Prioritization of Sezar Subbasins in Terms of Flooding Potentian Using Game Theory

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Arshia Azadeh; HAGHIZADEH ALI; TAHMASEBIPOUR NASER; ZEINIVAND HOSSEIN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY Year:2019 | Volume:5 | Issue:4 Page(s): 1219-1231

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

561

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Prioritization of Sezar Subbasins in Terms of Flooding Potentian Using Game Theory

Author(s)

Arshia Azadeh | HAGHIZADEH ALI | TAHMASEBIPOUR NASER | ZEINIVAND HOSSEIN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Bargaining algorithmQ2

Basin priorityQ2

Borda algorithmQ2

Game theoryQ2

Flood riskQ2

Abstract

Making the optimal decision to prioritize the operation in watershed management projects is to reduce the risk of flooding due to the impact of various parameters, complex and, of course, important. The Game theory has a high performance in making the optimal decision to solve multi-objective problems. In this study, this method was used to prioritize on the watershed of the Flood risk in the Sezar watershed. By using two Borda algorithms and bargaining in Game theory, the most effective parameters in all sub-watersheds and the most critical sub-watersheds were identified. By implementing the Borda scoring method, residential parameters with 93. 5, drainage density of 91 and average slope, and the shape of the sub area with a score of 90. 5, and hence the implementation of the Bargaining algorithm, the most effective parameters in the competition between the 12 parameters in all sub-watersheds, Moderate slope parameters, length of the main waterways and rangelands were used. According to the principles governing this method, the selection of these parameters is based on the running of all players in all fields. In fact, the three parameters mentioned above are faster in all sub-watersheds, and the number 16 is the number Subways have arrived. Finally, the Sezar watershed Prioritization Plans are presented with both methods, which are in the first place under the Borda method, under the domains I, N, G, P and O, and in the bargaining chamber, G, H, N, I and F are in the first place.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Arshia, Azadeh, HAGHIZADEH, ALI, TAHMASEBIPOUR, NASER, & ZEINIVAND, HOSSEIN. (2019). Prioritization of Sezar Subbasins in Terms of Flooding Potentian Using Game Theory. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, 5(4 ), 1219-1231. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/254131/en

Vancouver: Copy

Arshia Azadeh, HAGHIZADEH ALI, TAHMASEBIPOUR NASER, ZEINIVAND HOSSEIN. Prioritization of Sezar Subbasins in Terms of Flooding Potentian Using Game Theory. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY[Internet]. 2019;5(4 ):1219-1231. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/254131/en

IEEE: Copy

Azadeh Arshia, ALI HAGHIZADEH, NASER TAHMASEBIPOUR, and HOSSEIN ZEINIVAND, “Prioritization of Sezar Subbasins in Terms of Flooding Potentian Using Game Theory,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF ECOHYDROLOGY, vol. 5, no. 4 , pp. 1219–1231, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/254131/en

Related Journal Papers