مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

987
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION METHODS IN STREAM FLOW MODELING USING SWAT IN TALEGHAN WATERSHED

Pages

  115-125

Abstract

EVAPOTRANSPIRATION process is a key element in hydrological SIMULATION of water supply, rainfall-runoff models, infiltration calculations and drought prediction models. Recently, several equations were used for estimating annual, monthly and daily EVAPOTRANSPIRATION in the world. In this study, the potential EVAPOTRANSPIRATION of TALEGHAN WATERSHED was estimated by three methods in the SWAT model including Priestley Taylor, Penman-Montieth and Hargreaves methods. The influence of applying these methods were evaluated on simulated stream flow of the TALEGHAN WATERSHED in the calibration (1998 - 2003) and validation (2003 - 2005) periods, using determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error (RMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe performance coefficient (NS) and skew index (PBIAS). Results revealed that the maximum and minimum values of simulated EVAPOTRANSPIRATION and consequently, simulated runoff were related to the Hargreaves and Priestley Taylor methods, respectively. Moreover, investigation of statistic coefficients showed that there is no much difference among the three methods. Results of ANOVA also confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference at the 99% level among the simulated mean monthly flow using the three methods. In conclusion, the Hargreaves method provided better results than the two other methods during calibration and validation periods.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KAVIAN, ATAOLLAH, BAHRAMI, MARZIEH, & ROUHANI, HAMED. (2017). COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION METHODS IN STREAM FLOW MODELING USING SWAT IN TALEGHAN WATERSHED. DESERT ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 6(15 ), 115-125. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/254476/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KAVIAN ATAOLLAH, BAHRAMI MARZIEH, ROUHANI HAMED. COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION METHODS IN STREAM FLOW MODELING USING SWAT IN TALEGHAN WATERSHED. DESERT ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING JOURNAL[Internet]. 2017;6(15 ):115-125. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/254476/en

    IEEE: Copy

    ATAOLLAH KAVIAN, MARZIEH BAHRAMI, and HAMED ROUHANI, “COMPARISON OF POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION ESTIMATION METHODS IN STREAM FLOW MODELING USING SWAT IN TALEGHAN WATERSHED,” DESERT ECOSYSTEM ENGINEERING JOURNAL, vol. 6, no. 15 , pp. 115–125, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/254476/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top