Comparison and Analysis of the Experimental and Numerical Results of Gas-Liquid Flow Separation in Axial-Flow Cyclonic Seperator

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

AKHLAGHI M.; iranmehr Sh.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING Year:2019 | Volume:49 | Issue:1 (86) Page(s): 1-10

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

406

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison and Analysis of the Experimental and Numerical Results of Gas-Liquid Flow Separation in Axial-Flow Cyclonic Seperator

Author(s)

AKHLAGHI M. | iranmehr Sh. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Gas-liquid flow separation

Uniflow I-Sep cyclone

Eulerian multiphase model

Volume of fluid multiphase model

Turbulent RSM model

Abstract

The performance of the axial flow cyclone separator known as I-Sep, with the aim of separation of gas-liquid flow of air and water is analysed. The experimental tests which have been done in collaboration with Caltec Company in Cranfield University are compared with numerical tests in different gas volume fractions and inlet flow conditions. The sensitivity analysis of simulation to the droplet size with the Eulerian model are performed and it is shown that the efficiency of the separation increases and the pressure loss decreases by increasing the droplet size. For two inlet gas volume fractions, 90% and 97. 5%, the simulation was performed using Eulerian and RSM models with 10 micron diameter droplets. The simulation results for the efficiency of separation and pressure loss were in well accordance with experimental results. For GVF equals to 97. 5%, optimum value is 88% for 0. 799 (kg/s) of inlet mass flow rate. For GVF equals to 90%, two maximum and one minimum point can be observed.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

AKHLAGHI, M., & iranmehr, Sh.. (2019). Comparison and Analysis of the Experimental and Numerical Results of Gas-Liquid Flow Separation in Axial-Flow Cyclonic Seperator. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 49(1 (86) ), 1-10. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/269981/en

Vancouver: Copy

AKHLAGHI M., iranmehr Sh.. Comparison and Analysis of the Experimental and Numerical Results of Gas-Liquid Flow Separation in Axial-Flow Cyclonic Seperator. JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2019;49(1 (86) ):1-10. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/269981/en

IEEE: Copy

M. AKHLAGHI, and Sh. iranmehr, “Comparison and Analysis of the Experimental and Numerical Results of Gas-Liquid Flow Separation in Axial-Flow Cyclonic Seperator,” JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 49, no. 1 (86) , pp. 1–10, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/269981/en

Related Journal Papers