COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EARTH SLOPES STABILITY ANALYSIS METHODS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

RAHIMI H.; FAKHRI TABALVANDANI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH Year:2001 | Volume:2 | Issue:6 Page(s): 69-80

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,979

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EARTH SLOPES STABILITY ANALYSIS METHODS

Author(s)

RAHIMI H. | FAKHRI TABALVANDANI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Not Registered.

Abstract

Various methods of stabilityanalysis for earth slope have been represented in cIuding the simple methods such as wedge and Fellenius and the rigorous method such as Janbu and Morgenstern. The purpose of this study is the comparison of these methods and consideration of the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Also a new computer program "STDAM" for earth slopes stability analysis using all existing methods have been prepared and represented. This program has graphical and numerical capability in results representing, and can analyse all different loading conditions for earth slopes design.The coparison was carried out among Fellenius, Bishop, Spenser and Janbu methods. As a criteria for checking the accuracy of each method the Finite element metod was also used, and the following conclusions were obtained.1- Fellenius method is not recommended because of its low accuracy.2- Solving of Spencer method formulas is very difficult and takes much time, also most of the times, the results are incorrect so the method is not recommended.3- Bishop method is relatively simple and reliable, but its accuracy in conditions involving the external forces such as earthquake force and also in cohesive soils is low.4- Janbu method is one of the best methods because of its high accuracy and relative simplicity.5- The results obtained by finite element method are close to those obtained by Bishop and Janbu methods which confirms validity of these methods.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

RAHIMI, H., & FAKHRI TABALVANDANI, M.. (2001). COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EARTH SLOPES STABILITY ANALYSIS METHODS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, 2(6), 69-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/28098/en

Vancouver: Copy

RAHIMI H., FAKHRI TABALVANDANI M.. COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EARTH SLOPES STABILITY ANALYSIS METHODS. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH[Internet]. 2001;2(6):69-80. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/28098/en

IEEE: Copy

H. RAHIMI, and M. FAKHRI TABALVANDANI, “COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT EARTH SLOPES STABILITY ANALYSIS METHODS,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 69–80, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/28098/en

Related Journal Papers