مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

324
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

194
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

QUALITY LOSS FUNCTION- A COMMON METHODOLOGY FOR THREE CASES

Pages

  218-234

Abstract

 The quality loss function developed by Genichi Taguchi considers three cases, nominal-the best, smaller-the-better, and larger-the-better. The methodology used to deal with the larger-the better case is slightly different than the other two cases. This research employs a term called TARGET-MEAN RATIO to propose a common formula for all three cases to bring about similarity among them. The TARGET-MEAN RATIO can take different values representing all three cases to bring consistency and simplicity in the model. In addition, it eliminates the assumption of target performance at an infinite level and brings the model closer to reality. Characteristics such as efficiency, coefficient of performance, and percent non-defective are presently not larger-the better characteristics due to the assumption of target performance at infinity and the subsequent necessary derivation of the formulae. These characteristics can also be brought under the category of the larger-the-better characteristics. An example of the efficiency of prime movers is discussed to illustrate that the efficiency can also be considered as a larger-the-better characteristic. A second example is presented to suggest the subtle differences between both methodologies.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHARMA, N.K., CUDNEY, E.A., RAGSDELL, K.M., & PARYANI, K.. (2007). QUALITY LOSS FUNCTION- A COMMON METHODOLOGY FOR THREE CASES. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (JISE), 1(3), 218-234. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/307065/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHARMA N.K., CUDNEY E.A., RAGSDELL K.M., PARYANI K.. QUALITY LOSS FUNCTION- A COMMON METHODOLOGY FOR THREE CASES. JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (JISE)[Internet]. 2007;1(3):218-234. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/307065/en

    IEEE: Copy

    N.K. SHARMA, E.A. CUDNEY, K.M. RAGSDELL, and K. PARYANI, “QUALITY LOSS FUNCTION- A COMMON METHODOLOGY FOR THREE CASES,” JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING (JISE), vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 218–234, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/307065/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button