A COMPRATIVE STUDY OF THREE METAHEURISTICS FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF TRUSSES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

GHOLIZADEH S.; BARATI H.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING Year:2012 | Volume:2 | Issue:3 Page(s): 423-441

Download Full-Text

View:

437

Download:

167

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPRATIVE STUDY OF THREE METAHEURISTICS FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF TRUSSES

Author(s)

GHOLIZADEH S. | BARATI H. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

OPTIMUM DESIGN

TRUSS STRUCTURE

MET HEURISTIC

PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION

HARMONT SEARCH

FIREFLY ALGORITHM

Abstract

In the present study, the computational performance of the PARTICLE SWARM OPTIMIZATION (PSO) harmony search (HS) and FIREFLY ALGORITHM (FA), as popular metaheuristics, is investigated for size and shape optimization of TRUSS STRUCTUREs. The PSO was inspired by the social behavior of organisms such as bird flocking. The HS imitates the musical performance process which takes place when a musician searches for a better state of harmony, while the FA was based on the idealized behavior of the flashing characteristics of natural fireflies. These algorithms were inspired from different natural sources and their convergence behavior is focused in this paper. Several benchmark size and shape optimization problems of TRUSS STRUCTUREs are solved using PSO, HS and FA and the results are compared. The numerical results demonstrate the superiority of FA to HS and PSO.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

GHOLIZADEH, S., & BARATI, H.. (2012). A COMPRATIVE STUDY OF THREE METAHEURISTICS FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF TRUSSES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2(3), 423-441. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/329375/en

Vancouver: Copy

GHOLIZADEH S., BARATI H.. A COMPRATIVE STUDY OF THREE METAHEURISTICS FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF TRUSSES. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2012;2(3):423-441. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/329375/en

IEEE: Copy

S. GHOLIZADEH, and H. BARATI, “A COMPRATIVE STUDY OF THREE METAHEURISTICS FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF TRUSSES,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPTIMIZATION IN CIVIL ENGINEERING, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 423–441, 2012, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/329375/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops