مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

3,518
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

IS THE HANDICRAFT ART? SEARCH FOR FINDING THE STATE OF HANDICRAFT AMONG THE ARTS, ACCORDING KANT’S AESTHETICS

Pages

  0-0

Keywords

ARTQ1

Abstract

 In KANT’ viewpoint, beauty is neither objective nor does it rely on concepts, but it is the subject that establishes the judgment of aesthetic in object of ART. KANT believes that the feeling of pleasure in judgment of taste arises from reflective judgment of the subject of judgment. He argues that ART is distinguished form nature, science and craft, and divides it into mechanical ART, pleasant ART and beautiful ART. Pleasant ART is a kind of ART whose purpose is just pleasure, while the criteria of judgment in beautiful ART is reflective judgment. The work of beautiful ART is the product of author’s genius through form. From the perspective of ideas KANT divides fine ARTs into three kinds: ART of speech, visual ART (Including plastic ART and painting) and ART of the beautiful play of sensations. According to his description of certain use of the object as a condition that limits the aesthetical ideas, it seems that HANDICRAFTs are sub- architecture, and should be regarded as plastic ART. But given the wide range of HANDICRAFT products, from mass production to unique objects with aesthetical features, and from useful to the decorative, they cannot all be equally judged as craft. This research seeks to analyze aesthetically the range of crafts based on the concepts explained in “Critique of Judgment”. This this way it distinguishes the field of ART and non-art in the productions of HANDICRAFT and introduces areas of pleasant ART and fine ART in objects of HANDICRAFT.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    KHABBAZI KENARI, MEHDI, & SEBTI, SAFA. (2017). IS THE HANDICRAFT ART? SEARCH FOR FINDING THE STATE OF HANDICRAFT AMONG THE ARTS, ACCORDING KANT’S AESTHETICS. KIMIYA YE HONAR, 6(22), 0-0. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/356863/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    KHABBAZI KENARI MEHDI, SEBTI SAFA. IS THE HANDICRAFT ART? SEARCH FOR FINDING THE STATE OF HANDICRAFT AMONG THE ARTS, ACCORDING KANT’S AESTHETICS. KIMIYA YE HONAR[Internet]. 2017;6(22):0-0. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/356863/en

    IEEE: Copy

    MEHDI KHABBAZI KENARI, and SAFA SEBTI, “IS THE HANDICRAFT ART? SEARCH FOR FINDING THE STATE OF HANDICRAFT AMONG THE ARTS, ACCORDING KANT’S AESTHETICS,” KIMIYA YE HONAR, vol. 6, no. 22, pp. 0–0, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/356863/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops

  • No record.





  • Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button