مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

233
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Comparison of MIKE NAM and AWBM models performance in simulation of daily runoff in mountainous regions

Pages

  1-14

Abstract

 Apart from the understanding of the impact of land use and climate changes on the water cycle and hydrology regime, Hydrological models are effective tools for designing and managing water resources. Currently, many Hydrological models have been developed to simulate the basin, though choosing the right model is a challenge. To this end, a correct understanding of the model, its advantages, and limitations is necessary. In this regard, several studies have been conducted to evaluate the Hydrological models performance in different regions and conditions. In the present study, the performance of two integrated hydrological and conceptual Rainfall-runoff models of AWBM and MIKE NAM in the simulation of the average daily runoff in Hamedan Gonbad basin was investigated. Although both models are lumped models for rainfall-runoff process, the MIKE NAM model has a more complex structure compared to the AWBM. In addition to considering the initial conditions, MIKE NAM model is also capable of simulating snowmelt. The results of the runoff simulation during the calibration and validation periods were evaluated using two statistical indicators of the Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) and percent bias (PBIAS). The NSE and PBIAS during the calibration and validation periods for the MIKE NAM model were 0. 8, 6. 3 and 0. 71,-4. 2; and 0. 6, 14. 33 and 0. 55,-9. 2 for AWBM model, respectively. The results showed that MIKE NAM model has a better performance in simulating daily runoff in Hamedan Gonbad basin compared to the AWBM model.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SAJADI BAMI, YASAMIN, PORHEMMAT, JAHANGIR, SEDGHI, HOSSEIN, & Jalalkamali, Navid. (2021). Comparison of MIKE NAM and AWBM models performance in simulation of daily runoff in mountainous regions. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES CONSERVATION, 10(3 ), 1-14. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/412376/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SAJADI BAMI YASAMIN, PORHEMMAT JAHANGIR, SEDGHI HOSSEIN, Jalalkamali Navid. Comparison of MIKE NAM and AWBM models performance in simulation of daily runoff in mountainous regions. JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES CONSERVATION[Internet]. 2021;10(3 ):1-14. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/412376/en

    IEEE: Copy

    YASAMIN SAJADI BAMI, JAHANGIR PORHEMMAT, HOSSEIN SEDGHI, and Navid Jalalkamali, “Comparison of MIKE NAM and AWBM models performance in simulation of daily runoff in mountainous regions,” JOURNAL OF WATER AND SOIL RESOURCES CONSERVATION, vol. 10, no. 3 , pp. 1–14, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/412376/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button