GRASS FIELD SEGMENTATION IN FOOTBALL IMAGES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

KANGAR LOU K.; KABIR E.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING (UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ) Year:2007 | Volume:34 | Issue:1 (46) ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING Page(s): 65-71

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

955

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

GRASS FIELD SEGMENTATION IN FOOTBALL IMAGES

Author(s)

KANGAR LOU K. | KABIR E. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

FOOTBALLQ1

GRASSQ1

SEGMENTATIONQ1

CLASSIFICATIONQ1

COLORQ1

TEXTUREQ1

WAVELET TRANSFORMQ1

Abstract

Grass field SEGMENTATION is the first step toward player tracking, compression and content based FOOTBALL image retrieval. In this paper we present two pixel-based techniques applied for GRASS field SEGMENTATION in FOOTBALL images. In the first method, the hue and a new TEXTURE feature are used for SEGMENTATION. In the second method, the hue and three wavelet features representing the spatial variation of image intensity are used to classify the image pixels into the GRASS and non-grass sets. Considering the feature space, in both methods, the CLASSIFICATION process is performed using an MLP classifier. In order to evaluate the performance of the proposed methods, 800 GRASS and non-grass samples are selected from 40 FOOTBALL video clips. The test results indicated that the GRASS and non-grass CLASSIFICATION accuracy were 99 and 99 percent in the fist method and 100 and 99 percent in the second method, respectively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

KANGAR LOU, K., & KABIR, E.. (2007). GRASS FIELD SEGMENTATION IN FOOTBALL IMAGES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING (UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ), 34(1 (46) ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING), 65-71. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/43797/en

Vancouver: Copy

KANGAR LOU K., KABIR E.. GRASS FIELD SEGMENTATION IN FOOTBALL IMAGES. JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING (UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ)[Internet]. 2007;34(1 (46) ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING):65-71. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/43797/en

IEEE: Copy

K. KANGAR LOU, and E. KABIR, “GRASS FIELD SEGMENTATION IN FOOTBALL IMAGES,” JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING (UNIVERSITY OF TABRIZ), vol. 34, no. 1 (46) ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING, pp. 65–71, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/43797/en

Related Journal Papers