Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

292
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

80
Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

TESTING THE FOUR MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF GULLY HEAD ADVANCEMENT (CASE STUDY: HABLEH ROOD BASIN- IRAN)

Pages

  61-68

Abstract

 Gully erosion is one of the most complicated and destructive forms of water erosion. In order to prevent this erosion, the important factors advancing gully head must be recognized. Nowadays, several models have been proposed in measuring gully head advancement and identifying the severity of erosion. These models must be calibrated for each country to see whether they are applicable or not. So it has been tried to study the necessities of the calibration in this research. This has been done in one of the sub-basins of HABLEH ROOD BASIN called Dehnamak in arid and semi-arid climate of IRAN. Three AERIAL PHOTOS of 1956, 1967 and 2000 years have been used to measure the gully head advancement in different periods of time including 1956-1967, 1967-2000 and 2000-2005. Then in order to calibrate four models: 1- Thompson, 2- SCS (I), 3- SCS (II) and 4- FAO, all factors have been measured and studied. Statistics studies such as relative error percent, absolute error percent and change variable percent have been used. The results of the mathematical study show that SCS (II) and FAO model have a relative error percent and absolute error percent with amounts of 37.3 and 7.51 and, 40.06 and 18.21, respectively. Regarding to change variable percent, only 0.51% can be seen as a different between SCS (II) and FAO models, because of the usage of same factors and coefficients, each of two models are close to each other. Finally, the best models in the studied area are SCS (II), FAO and SCS (I) respectively, and Thompson model cannot be proposed.

Cites

  • No record.

    • References

  • No record.

    • Cite

    APA: Copy

    AHMADI, HASAN, MOHAMMADI, A.A., GHODOUSI, JAMAL, & SALAJEGHEH, A.. (2007). TESTING THE FOUR MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF GULLY HEAD ADVANCEMENT (CASE STUDY: HABLEH ROOD BASIN- IRAN). DESERT (BIABAN), 12(1), 61-68. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/542585/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    AHMADI HASAN, MOHAMMADI A.A., GHODOUSI JAMAL, SALAJEGHEH A.. TESTING THE FOUR MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF GULLY HEAD ADVANCEMENT (CASE STUDY: HABLEH ROOD BASIN- IRAN). DESERT (BIABAN)[Internet]. 2007;12(1):61-68. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/542585/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HASAN AHMADI, A.A. MOHAMMADI, JAMAL GHODOUSI, and A. SALAJEGHEH, “TESTING THE FOUR MODELS FOR PREDICTION OF GULLY HEAD ADVANCEMENT (CASE STUDY: HABLEH ROOD BASIN- IRAN),” DESERT (BIABAN), vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/542585/en

    Related Journal Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.

    • Related Plans

  • No record.

    • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top