COMPARISON OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHYSICAL MODEL WITH 1D, QUASI-2D, AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELS IN A RIVER REACH

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

YASI M.; AZIZPANAH B.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH Year:2007 | Volume:2 | Issue:3 Page(s): 78-89

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,756

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHYSICAL MODEL WITH 1D, QUASI-2D, AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELS IN A RIVER REACH

Author(s)

YASI M. | AZIZPANAH B. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PHYSICAL MODELQ3

HEC-RAS MODELQ3

BRI-STARS MODELQ4

FAST-2D MODELQ4

Abstract

Numerical models are being used widely in river engineering projects. However, the reliability of these models, minimum field data requirement, and the optimal computational processes are of major concern. This study compares the simulated steady flow parameters from well-known numerical models with that of a true river PHYSICAL MODEL. A fixed-bed model is developed for the Nazloo River, IRAN, with horizontal scale of 1:100 and vertical scale of 1:20. Results from HEC-RAS (1D), BRI-STARS (quasi 2D), and FAST-2D (2D) were compared for corresponding flow parameters under similar initial and boundary conditions. This was made for five different flows in three sub-reaches along the river (i.e. downstream of a bridge, bridge reach, upstream of the bridge). The best adapted results were produced by HEC-RAS. BRI-STARS and FAST-2D MODELs took the next ranks respectively. The averaged predictive errors were rated 1.8, 2.2, and 5.5 percent for water surface elevations and 10.2, 9, and 12.6 percent for mean velocities, respectively. The application of each model is recommended in river projects subject to the inclusion of the degree of certainties provided by the present study.

Cites

MODIFYING EMPIRICAL EQUATIONS OF SEEPAGE ESTIMATION USING DIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS (BOLDAJI EARTH CANAL, CHAHARMAHAL AND BAKHTIARI PROVINCE)

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

YASI, M., & AZIZPANAH, B.. (2007). COMPARISON OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHYSICAL MODEL WITH 1D, QUASI-2D, AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELS IN A RIVER REACH. IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2(3), 78-89. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/99872/en

Vancouver: Copy

YASI M., AZIZPANAH B.. COMPARISON OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHYSICAL MODEL WITH 1D, QUASI-2D, AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELS IN A RIVER REACH. IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH[Internet]. 2007;2(3):78-89. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/99872/en

IEEE: Copy

M. YASI, and B. AZIZPANAH, “COMPARISON OF FLOW CHARACTERISTICS IN A PHYSICAL MODEL WITH 1D, QUASI-2D, AND 2D NUMERICAL MODELS IN A RIVER REACH,” IRAN-WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 78–89, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/99872/en

Related Journal Papers