Background: Urinary incontinence is a very common problem affecting the quality of life of many people, especially women. Hence, this study was done to investigate the results obtained from intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) method in treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in patients.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was carried out as census on female patients suffering from SUI who had been treated using IVS method in Najmieh Subespeciality Hospital, Tehran, during 2004-2009 years. Data were extracted through interviews and from patients’ medical records. Descriptive statistics (mean and percent) and inferential statistics (independent t-test and its exact version, Bootstrap, Chi-square test, and Fisher’s exat test) were utilized and data were analyzed using SPSS software.Results: A total of 357 women with mean age of 45.18±8.78 years participated in this study.Recovery rate of emergency and stress-related SUI by IVS method were 80.1% and 98%, respectively.In addition, urgency SUI had statistically significant correlations with diabetes, blood pressure, age, total number of deliveries, and normal vaginal delivery (NVD). Also, stress-related SUI had significant correlations with post-void residue (PVR), total number of delivery, NVD, and cesarean section.Conclusion: Generally, it can be concluded that treatment response of IVS in this study is comparable and even better than other existing and customary modes of treatment.

Religious jurisprudence has been paid special attention the issue self-respect protection so that obligation and prohibition order have been emphasized in case of interference with self- life or else in many cases. However the jurists have not thought about, the issue of physician responsibility for emergency patients in particular. But the physician responsibility for emergency patients can be studied in two aspect in religious jurisprudence. Therefore, investigation of their view point requires a deep study. The results show that religious jurisprudence have mostly thought about the rescue of risky patients in many traditional examples. But regarding to relationship between duty and statute order; it can be said about the above mentioned assumptions are not property and the majority opinion of religious jurisprudence is on the necessity of this order in these conditions. Who is leaving it she or he will be held accountable.Although, there is dispute Between Sunni and Shiite religious jurisprudence about necessity of getting consent to begin treatment of emergency patients who their family are not available, but the majority Shiite religious jurisprudence have ordered on the necessity of this term.