In 1335 AH/ 1917 AD, and objection movement rose up by the leadership of sheykh mohammad khiyabani and via Democratic party activity and dominate associations of Democrats in Azerbaijan and after a transient period, by establishing a short insurrection He combated with central government from 16 Rajab to 29 zihajeh 1338 AH/ 19 April to 14 September 1920 AD., During these above indicated years, Modernism idea and proceeding to the cause of monogenesis of legal society after Mashrouteh period, was one of the most parallelism in movement idea and purpose.Regard to this fact, the movement deliberation, requires the outreach realization of thought conditions among society statistics and also having cultural positive ideas to progress and advance the civil society and because modernism was introduced as society renovation, so, having attention to different kinds of people specially women rights was the unique discussion among the movement idea makers.Feminism term is a new word in Iran history and it seems that this word was first discussed in year 1338 AH/ 1920 AD by some of the movement intellectuals and there were a lot of discussions about effective factors to improve women conditions.The Present research has proceeded to recognize the movement ideas in Khiyabani' s movement and shows that how this reform talking has caused to women activity in political and social arenas.

In formation and continuation process of political and social movements, the most important part is consist of the leader's motives, their purposes, and extent of intellectual and executive basis stability of movements. In Jangal and Khiyabani's movements, it was necessary to gain access to original factors and elements which frame the leader's ideas and opinions, as well as the desires that they wanted to gain. At the same time, their political organization in order to push forward and achieve to ideal ends, was one of the evident points of them. The study and evaluation of these two movements in the form of a comparative approach can reveal amount of potentialities and stability of executive basis and it can distinguish the intellectual and executive relationship of them in their achievements and failures. To achieve to this important matter, we will consider and explain, in three general sections, the effective causes and factors in formation of movements in comparative and then we will deal with intellectual approaches and finally comparison of their executive structure.

In 1338L. /1920C. Rafia Amin Khan and Taghi Rafat who were the members of Azerbaijan democratic party under the leadership of Sheikh Mohammad Khiabani for the first time established Azerbaijani Feminism based on key concepts of tradition and modernism. The aim of the mentioned thinkers was to empower women in gaining equal opportunities with men for achieving political, economical, social and cultural sources with the aim of promoting status, position and social role of women in civil participation in society. Therefore, the subject of the current study is to investigate what the thoughts of the belief system of the school of Azerbaijani which is supporting women about the issue of gender are. And with this assumption that, gender in Iran is a historical issue which in culture and society structures has been organized in the forms of gender inequalities. Changing the society in all aspects especially promoting public awareness could help women gain equal situation. The methodology and procedure of the current research is based on interdisciplinary studies of sociology and history and the purpose and main finding of this research is also explaining and confirming of the mentioned issue.

The relation between historical situations, texts, and readers is complicated by the various reasons. This complexity prevents one to read and understand the texts with ease. One of the affecting factors in this complexity is the problem of discourse changes in historical process. This paper, by analyzing the narratives of Sheikh Mohammad Khiabani's uprising, is about to study the effect of discourse change in case of two dominate discourses: national constitutionalist discourse (Azarbayjan-based, Iran-based, uprising-based), and national ancient oriented discourse (Iran-based). The method of research in this paper is critical analysis of narrative and discourse. The result shows that discourse turn does not allow the events to be understood as they are happened, and causes various diverse conflicting readings of the event. In these narratives Khiabani's uprising has been read into a wide range: from freedom seeking and democratic to identity seeking and separatist, from patriotism to dependency on foreign agents aiming the decomposition of the country. Also the characteristics and motivations of Khiabani and his followers given in the narratives are variable in terms of selfishness, authoritarian, humanitarian, Anti-oppression and Anti-colonialism.

The late Shaikh M.H. Kashef ul-Qeta (1878-1955) was one of the Shia religious scholars and leaders during the last century, who was active in both fields of Jurisprudence and social affairs. He had written many scientific books, that some of them are not printed yet.One of those works, is his "comments" about the "Sharh e Nahj ul-Balagha" of Shaikh M. Abdu (Died in 1905), the high rank Sunni Scholar, the principal of the Al-Azhar academy of Egypt, the close friend and student of Syed Jamal oddin Asad-Abadi.The current essay gives a report about that work.In the first part (this volume) the notes of Kashef ul-Qeta about the speeches of Nahj ul-Balagheh, and in the 2nd part (next volume) his notes and comments about the letters and sentences of Nahj ul-Balagha will be provided.

It seems that every political thought in itself, contains an ideal political society. This ideal society can be apparent, such as Farabi' utopia or the hidden and latent, Such as Sohrevardi' ideal society. Theorizing About political ideal is result of social and political crisis. One of the most turbulent periods in the history of Iran is Qajar era, which is faced with different crisis such as absolute power and colonialism. This crisis led to contemplate the many thinkers and each according self- effort to have a response to this crisis. One of the thinkers is Sheikh Mohammed Ismail Mahallati that his political thought is less considered. It seems that he answers to this crisis and his political ideal is different from other thinkers in this era. Accordingly, the central question of this paper is that: What is the Mahallati specific reply to crisis of constitutionalism era? And how is his ideal political society? What are its features? And Finally, What relationship exists between justice and public interest in his ideal society.

Shaikh M.H.Kashef Ul - Qeta (1878 - 1955) was one of the Shia religious scholars during the last century, who made complementary studies about the commentary book of Shaikh M.Abdu over the Nahjul Balhgha, which is published for the first time. Here, you may find the second part of that research.

Kasshi In his biography book, while naming the companions of Imam sixth to eighth (AS), speaks about three groups of helpers, by which the recent mention some people as consensus. Muhammad ibn Abi Omair was in the third group. He is a prominent and well-known companion of Imam al-Kazim, Imam Reza and Imam Javad (AS), the narrator and the author of an important part of Shiite traditions. His name in addition to the people of consensus, is seen among the trustworthy. Prominent Shia scholars since the beginning of this rules up to now, has adopted various intellectual positions and subsequently practical manners and adopted approachs from broad acceptance to criticism and outright denial. Because Kafi is the first of the four books and the most important Shiite tradition, this article has tried its approach to narratives Ibn Abi Amir earned his tradition in this valuable book.

Intertextuality is a new approach to literary criticism introduced by the Bulgarian-French critic Julia Kristova in the twentieth century. According to this approach, no text is enough, Rather, each text is a feedback from its predecessor or contemporary texts that has been influenced in various ways, Because of this, the texts interact with each other and are closely related to each other. Intertextuality has different types including, It is religious, historical, mythological, Quranic, etc., and is known as "Al-Tanas" in Arabic, and has been expressed in various forms in the works of many writers and poets. Among the famous Iraqi poets of the thirteenth century AH, Sheikh Hussein Ibn Al-Hajj Muhammad Al-Najaf is a Shiite poet and praiser of the Ahl al-Bayt of Prophethood (PBUH) who has used all the Quranic verses to convey his meaning and purpose to the reader. In this research, we have tried to study the descriptive-analytical method of how the effects of Quranic intertextuality are reflected in the poetry of this Shiite poet and how he is influenced by beautiful Quranic verses. The results show that the poet has considered all kinds of complete textual intertextual relations, complete adaptation, inspirational and conceptual, allusive by calling Quranic, partial and lexical characters, and partial and lexical intertextuality has a higher frequency. Items such as, Mentioning the virtues of the divine prophets, naming the idols of the age of ignorance, man's lack of trust in God, threatening the oppressive rulers, the concept of friendliness and friendship of the Ahl al-Bayt, and the heedless of the path of truth have doubled the verbal and spiritual beauty of his poems. Is.