Introduction: To protect hydraulic structures like spillways, chutes, and bottom outlets against damage caused by cavitation, the air is usually pumped into the regions with a cavitation index below the critical value. Using the aerators, the erosion of the spillway surfaces caused by cavitation can be eliminated. The aerators are usually mounted on the bottom or the lateral walls of the spillway and cause the separation of high speed flows from the spillway surface and prevent erosion on the rigid surfaces. Most of the experiments have focused on the average air concentration of flow, while the amount of the air and the way it comes out the flow must be determined. Therefore, in the present study, the experimental data presented by Pfister (2007) for numerical simulation of flow over the aerator was used to investigate variations of the air concentration along the chute bottom. FLUENT software was used for the simulation of the two-phase air-water flow. Jump length has been considered as an important and effective factor in entering air into the flow and a criterion for verification. Methodology: According to the importance of the determination of the minimum volume of required air to prevent cavitation damages, the numerical effects of the air concentration during chute has been studied in this research. Eulerian and K-ɛ (RNG) models have been selected for two-phase simulation and for studying the turbulence effect respectively. The structured and unstructured mesh has been reviewed for the meshing model, finally, the use of structured mesh has been considered. As mentioned, the result of Pfister (2007) model has been utilized for validation and the length of the jet in crossflow was the criteria of validation. Therefore, parameters affecting the length of jet flow include the ramps with angels of 5. 7, 8. 1, and 11. 3 degrees, the steps with the heights of 23, 25, 44, 45, and 100 millimeters, the combination of the ramp and the steps, various Froude numbers in the range of 5. 8 to 10. 4, different ramp heights include 0, 6. 7, 13. 3, and 26. 7 millimeters and the chute slopes of 12, 30, and 50 degrees have been studied. The proper estimate of the jump length from the aerators has been simulated for 93 models. Additionally, the bed air concentration during chute and the air concentration at the depth, in the downstream of the impact point, has been modeled using Computational Fluid Dynamics and FLUENT software that can be employed in determining the distance of aerators. Results and Discussion: In this research, the effects of Froude number, the slope of the ramp, the initial height of the flow, the height of the step, and the ramp height on coefficient m has been studied considering the equation of changes in the bed air concentration ( (( / ) 1) m x L jet C C e ). In this equation, Cx/Ljet-1 represents the bed air concentration in the ( / 1) b x L jet point of impact to the chute bottom and m is a coefficient for which sensitivity has been tested. According to the result, air outflow decreases by increasing the Froude number. This shows a reverse trend for aerators with the ramp. Increasing the height of the step speeds up the increasing amount of m as well. The air outflow gradient goes up with the increasing the slope of the ramp so that the air outflow gradient has a significant rise by increasing the step height. The result does not show the specific trend for air outflow gradient as a function of the initial height of the flow. An increase in the step height results in increasing the length of the jump and increases the amount of the air entering the flow and the growth of air outlet from flow also increases. The air outlet gradient rises by increasing the ramp height. After determining the jump length of jet, the rate of the air entering the flow and the variability of the bottom airflow can be investigated by the equations suggested by the authors, accordingly, the appropriate distance between two aerators can be defined. The location of the first aerator is the initial point of cavitation and the distance of the second aerator can be affected by factors as follows: 1. The rate of the air coming out of the downstream of the first aerator 2. Natural aeration of the flow from the free surface. Conclusion: A comparison of the results indicates the numerical and experimental models are compatible. According to the importance of the point of the impact, where the flow collides at the chute bottom (sudden outlet of air due to collision), the point was considered as the reference point for the calculations in the equation. Generally, the results showed that the air concentration downstream of the aerators increases with an increase in Froude Number, ramp height, steps height, and ramp angle. This decreases as the height of water upstream of the aerator increases.