In the levels of jarh (criticizing) and ta’deel (praising) narrators, the most severe confrontations by early rijali scholars were with the ghalis (exaggerators). In response to this viewpoint, two approaches have been taken: In the present era, some rijali scholars have tried to remove the accusation of exaggeration from some narrators to find a way to accept their narrations. From ancient times, a few have even assumed, even if exaggeration is proven, that it does not prevent a narrator from being reliable. Ayatollah Khamenei is one of those who believe in the possibility of bringing reliability and exaggeration together, and with considerable evidence, he has opened a way to trust some of those accused of exaggeration. The nature of this viewpoint is a question whose answer will play a very important role in reconstructing and understanding the ghali. Therefore, this research aims to evaluate this viewpoint using a documentary method for collecting data and an analytical-descriptive method as a tool for evaluating data. Part of the research findings can be reported as follows: The complete rejection of the narrations of each of the questionable groups by all early rijali scholars is accompanied by their unreliability, and since the complete rejection of the narrations of the ghali by all early rijali scholars has not been proven, proving the unreliability of the ghali using the approach of early rijali scholars is not possible. In other words, since there is no reason other than the approach of early rijali scholars for not considering the ghali reliable, a general judgment cannot be made about the unreliability of the ghali. On the other hand, logically, as long as exaggeration is at the level of a belief, it does not harm the reliability of the narrator and, in this regard, is no different from other beliefs such as Waqifiyya, Fathites, and so on. However, one cannot ignore the understanding of the nature of exaggeration as an important criterion in analyzing how to deal with the ghali.