Purpose: To compare the efficacy and adverse events of sildenafil monotherapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with its FDA-approved counterpart, tadalafil. Materials and Methods: In this single-arm self-controlled clinical trial, 33 patients were enrolled. All patients underwent a 6-week treatment with sildenafil, followed by a 4-week washout period and finally a 6-week treatment with tadalafil. Patients were examined on each appointment and post-void residual (PVR) urine, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Quality of life index (IPSS-QoL index) were recorded subsequently. Efficacy of each drug regimen was then evaluated by comparing these outcome parameters. Results: Both sildenafil and tadalafil were shown to improve PVR (both p <. 001), IPSS (both p <. 001) and IPSS-QoL index (both p <. 001) significantly. Sildenafil was more effective than tadalafil in reducing PVR (mean difference (95%CI) = 9. 91% (4. 11, 15. 72), p <. 001) and ameliorating IPSS-QoL index (mean difference (95%CI) = 19. 3% (4. 47, 34. 41), p =. 027). Moreover, although not significant, sildenafil reduced IPSS more than tadalafil (mean difference (95%CI) = 3. 33% (-0. 22, 6. 87), p =. 065). Concurrent erectile dysfunction did not affect responsiveness to therapy with either sildenafil or tadalafil but age was inversely related to post-treatment IPSS in both sildenafil (B = 0. 21 (0. 04, 0. 37), p =. 015) and tadalafil (B = 0. 14 (0. 02, 0. 26), p =. 021) regimens with a more prominent role in responsiveness to sildenafil (β = 0. 31) compared to tadalafil (β = 0. 19). Conclusion: Considering the significantly better improvement of PVR and IPSS-Qol index with sildenafil, this drug can be nominated as a suitable alternative for tadalafil as a BPH treatment, especially in younger patients who don’t have any contraindications