Introduction: Cultural criticism regards the cultural patterns in the literature and examines concepts such as patriarchy and the isolation of the female. Feminist criticism is a subset of cultural criticism. Feminism is an organized movement to defend women's rights, which is rooted in the European Enlightenment. What is known as feminism today is the organized supporting of the rights and interests of women to achieve individual independence and eliminate discrimination, especially in the 12th century. Feminism and feminist criticism is more a kind of cultural criticism than a literary theory, because the discussion is about women's opinions and women's language and whether or not there is a difference between women's and men's writings. This type of thinking was accepted in the literature mainly because women writers were looking for a way to convey the voice of equality with a tool called literature. KAMAL abu-deeb is a pioneer of cultural criticism in Arabic critical discourse, who has dedicated many of his works to the topic of culture and women in the last few decades. His works address the cultural challenges of the Arab society in dealing with and interacting differently with women, which includes the different stages of a woman's life from birth to university and cohabitation. Like philosophers such as Foucault and Derrida, he believes that the reason for the different status of women in patriarchal societies should be found in the life process of Arab women, which starts from the moment of birth and continues until adulthood. In fact, this gender discrimination is caused by the behaviors that create differences between these two human genders from birth. This article uses a descriptive-analytical method to examine the works of Abu Deeb, especially the books Anjar fi Jami al-Itjahat Beghadh, Al-Kitaba and Eskhaliyyah al-Saltah, and Al-Hurriyya, from the perspective of feminist criticism and the ideas related to women. The study comes to the conclusion that Abu Deeb's feminist criticism approach is influenced by deconstruction, post-structuralism, theories of Kristeva, Linda Naklin, Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan's psychoanalysis, and authentic Arabic culture. Methodology: With a descriptive-analytical method, this research analyzes the manifestations of the cultural criticism of KAMAL abu-Deeb. The research seeks to use Weber's descriptive-analytical method based on document analysis and content analysis, which often relies on the text along with all its features, and critical works, including Anjar fi Jami al-Itjahat Baghadh, Al-Kataba and Eshakali al-Salah, and Al-Huriyah analyzed from the perspective of feminist criticism and the issues related to women. Results and discussion: In most of his studies, especially the analysis of Al-Stallah, al-Huriyya and other scientific research articles in prestigious European journals, Abu Deeb aims to provide a deep reading of women and their relationships within the male culture. The distinction of Abu Deeb's intellectual project is in his treatment of women as a model and a cultural sign. The critic's boldness in expressing his theories is one of his distinct differences from other Arab critics. In this respect, he considers himself as the first critic who entered cultural criticism methodically. His classification of the level of culture into official and unofficial shows that the writers in the Arab world at the level of official culture have to comply with the borders and lines drawn by the governments. In such an environment, real writers and heroes will never emerge because the heroes of this world are the result of imagination produced by the repressive culture. Abu Deeb's feminist criticism approach influenced by deconstruction, post-structuralism, theories of Kristeva, Linda Naklin and Michel Foucault, Jacques Lacan's psychoanalysis, and authentic Arabic culture. The difference between Abu Deeb's cultural criticism and other Arab critics is that, in addition to presenting his ideas, he has adapted and implemented Arabic literary anthologies. For this purpose, he has selected and analyzed texts from the Arabic literature in the Jahili period up to the present in order to prove and support his theoretical discussions. The critic in works such as Analysis of al-Salatlah, AlHuriyya and other scientific research articles in prestigious European magazines aims to present a profound image of women and their relationships within the male culture. He considers the lack of initiatives and innovations in the Arabic literature, especially in the field of story writing, to be due to the structure of domination and power, and he believes that not only a female artist but no other artist will grow in this incomplete structure. In fact, he offers a more comprehensive opinion than Linda Knocklin. Conclusion: Abu Deeb's criticism should be viewed with respect to Arab critics in this era, in addition to his opinions, good theories in application, and the corresponding research conducted on Arabic literatures. In this case, there are dozens of items, formal and informal, to consider. Care should also be taken about the limits and borders involved. There is evidence for the lack of innovation and clarity in the Arabic literature in terms of structures and belief in structural incompleteness.