The nationalist historiography of Afghanistan is predominantly based on narratives of male action in the fields of politics, war, and governance, where women are either absent or represented only in relation to men and masculine values. Adopting a critical approach, this article employs qualitative content analysis of the foundational texts of this school to address the question of how the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan has represented the identity and status of women. The aim of the research is to analyze this representation and critique the logic of its androcentric narrative. The necessity of this research lies not in reconstructing the historical narrative, but in exposing the symbolic and discursive mechanisms through which the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan divests women of historical agency and reduces them to a marginal element. The research findings indicate that the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan, beyond merely reflecting the patriarchal structure, actively reproduces the symbolic order of gender inequality. The specific achievement of this analysis is the identification and explication of the systematic pattern of omission, marginalization, or instrumental representation of women in three key areas: "politics," "war," and "society." In the political sphere, women predominantly appear in connection with political marriages and tribal alliances, lacking an independent identity. In war narratives, women are often depicted as "passive motivators," "victims," or symbolic "mediators." In the social arena, their identity is defined under male and tribal affiliations. By critiquing the androcentric model within Afghanistan's nationalist historiographical school, this article emphasizes the necessity of a polyphonic re-reading to restore women's historical agency and achieve a more balanced understanding of the past.IntroductionNationalist historiography in Afghanistan has actively reproduced a value system and social hierarchy based on gender. By centering concepts such as courage, honor, and defense of the homeland – attributes assigned to the male domain – this school has created an ideological framework within which roles are redefined based on gender. The main question is: through what mechanisms has Afghanistan's nationalist historiography represented women, and what have been the consequences of this representation for women's historical agency? A review of the literature shows that, despite significant research on historiographical schools in Afghanistan, a systematic and critical study focusing on the representation of "women" in the foundational texts of this school remains a research gap.Research MethodologyThis research is qualitative and analytical-critical in purpose, employing qualitative content analysis to examine the representation of women in the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan. The research does not aim to reconstruct historical events, but rather to analyze the narrative and discursive logic of historiographical texts and the methods by which the identity and status of women are formulated within them. The research population comprises prominent texts of Afghan nationalist historiography, purposefully selected based on their central role in shaping the dominant narrative. The main body of this research includes works by authors such as Abdul Hay Habibi, Mir Ghulam Mohammad Ghobar, Mohammad Hasan Kakar, Mir Mohammad Seddiq Farhang, Habibullah Rafi', Mohammad Asif Ahang, Mohammad Amin Sayqal, and Abdul Hakim Tabeebi. Data from these works have been categorized and analyzed under three themes: "women and politics," "women and war," and "women and society."Discussion and FindingsWomen and PoliticsThe representation of women in the political sphere is organized around three axes. The first axis is women and political factions, where women are represented as elements dependent on tribes and in relation to men. The frequency of political marriages and the tribal affiliations of princes' mothers are identified as key factors in the formation of political factions. The second axis concerns women in political marriages. Here, women are depicted as victims and as instruments for achieving political legitimacy and economic gain. The third axis concerns women in the political court, where their limited agency is entirely redefined as dependent on tribal prestige or male status. In this context, harem narratives are recounted not as the lived experiences of women, but from a male perspective to represent the power of kings.Women and WarIn war narratives, women sometimes appear as motivators of war, not due to women's agency, but because of transgressions against honor [namus], which provoke masculine honor [ghayrat]. Also, in limited instances, women are represented in the role of mediators in war, but this mediation is narrated within traditional maternal roles. Narratives of women warriors are also reflected in the nationalist history of Afghanistan, confined to national resistance wars, where women are depicted as supporters of men or as inspirations. Meanwhile, the representation of women as victims of war is very limited, indicating that the depth of their suffering is ignored in this historiography.Women and SocietyIn the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan, the representation of women's social position predominantly occurs under the rubric of subordination to men and the tribe, where women's identity is defined in connection with men and tribal affiliation, devoid of independent identity. In such a narrative, instances of women's independent presence are exceptional and faint. These instances date back to the early twentieth century and the reforms of King Amanullah Khan and brief periods of political openness following the Constitutionalist era. However, these representations are also presented as disconnected events influenced by top-down policies.ConclusionA critical analysis of the foundational texts of the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan demonstrates that this historiographical school, relying on an androcentric logic, has provided an incomplete and marginal representation of women. The quantitative and qualitative absence of women in the major works of this school indicates an epistemic-discursive structure that equates "real history" with male political and military developments. The analysis of the three themes showed that in this historiographical school, women are either omitted or represented instrumentally in relation to male actions. This pattern has transformed the nationalist historiography of Afghanistan into an "androcentric historiography." Therefore, the article emphasizes the necessity of a polyphonic re-reading of history and the restoration of women's historical agency.