In the present paper, we are seeking to investigate the challenges of electronic arbitration, the term electronic arbitration, because it only lasts for a decade, is notorious for many of the adversaries, on the one hand, scientific advances have brought about changes in traditional adjudication in recent years. Although electronic judgments are the same as traditional arbitration, and the only method of applying it has been changed, the establishment of this new institution has led to the emergence of numerous legal issues that the upward trend in this space reflects the will of mankind in this technology in judgment, and this This has produced a large number of questions that responded to Despite the legal vacuum and the lack of uniform international procedures, these questions sparked controversy among lawyers; attempts by arbitration organizations have been conducted with numerous conferences, but they have not yet been able to make electronic judgment in the domestic and even dare. Said that in the international arena in the disputes settlement system, the traditional process of arbitration is to be judged, the method of the present article is of an analytical-descriptive type with an adaptive approach. Our findings in this study are: E-arbitration is the best option for non-judicial settlement of disputes. It is estimated that about 73% of international companies are currently using this mechanism Because, firstly, the procedure is simple, secondly: the reviewers deal with the issue that is chosen by the parties; thirdly, it saves considerable time and money.