The office of judgment is one of the most important, sensitive, and valuable social posts that have been assigned to the judge and the religious and cultural elders of Persian literature have placed the exact conditions for it. It has been tried using some literary texts such as Bustan and Gulistan of saadi, rumi's Masnavi-i Ma'navi, Hadiqa al-hagiqah and Shari'a al-Tariqah, divan of Parvin Etesami, Siyasatnameh or Seyr al-mulû k, Chahar Maghaleh, Roze Khold, Latayef al-tavayef, Nasihat al-Molû k, the judges ' position and their influence on the society around them and a competent definition of a competent judge, who is endowed with funds, is permitted to offer a presentation to the audience, avoiding the air of air and adorned with ethical ornaments, away from the risks of corruption and etc. the method of work in this study has been analysis of content based on library resources; so that the texts have been read, then the results of the judgment are extracted and classified according to the subject. According to the research, there is an average of 3/873% of the content of the literature examined by the judge’ s manners and ethics. In the meantime, the letters of the Siyasat Nameh, Latayef al-Tavayef and Gulistan of Saadi have devoted more to this story. Of course, 25/81% of the teachings are related to the social ethics of the judges and only 75/18% of which are subject to their personal morality. And meanwhile Bustan of Saadi, divan of Parvin Etesami, Chahar Maghale and ghazzali’ s Nasihat al-Molû k the highest share of social ethics and Masnavi-i Ma'navi and Latayef al-Tavayef have the greatest share of the use of individual morality.