The international criminal law by seeking to provide the international order and security, gradually has attempted by moving away from common law, aiming to use, such as municipal law, serious and crucial punishment to penalize the international criminals. Because of some difficulties and problems related to international criminal cooperation of the countries, it has been usually moving from an international criminal policy to an international penal (criminal) policy very slowly. And there is no doubt that the mere criminalization view rising of the source of the criminal municipal law of the countries which indicates itself as an international and suppressing policy, can not solely prevent and confront the international crimes. So, we should as municipal systems came to this result, by planning and efforts of lawyers and by programming and using the international legal procedures as well as criminal municipal law seeking a coordinated action; in this way and as a unique and active «international criminal policy» we can prevent atrocities and murdering innocent people. Changes and interferences of different systems of United Nations Organization such as Security Council, on the one hand, and the six stages experience of international criminal courts and the efforts in order to consider all instruments and criminal process for these courts, on the other, showing a kind of globalization of law and consequently refer to an international criminal policy. Accepting a kind of judicial role for Security Council in founding these courts, on the one hand, and the appearance of municipal criminal literature in the texts of articles of statutes and rules of the penal code as well as the arguments of these courts, on the other, relate a gradual illustration of an international criminal policy that, as municipal law characteristics put the individual criminal responsibility in the highest point of importance.