Objectives: The purpose of this research is to describe and analyze theoretical foundations in the approaches of indigenous humanities in Iran. Method: The present study is based on the place and library, as a qualitative paradigm. On the other hand, in terms of nature, exploratory-descriptive, the method of data collection is a qualitative content analysis. Results: The findings indicated that some of the intellectual traditions of the humanities such as Foucault, Phenomenology, Frankfurte, Hegel, and Popper were the gateways for the indigenization of the humanities in Iran, and some of these traditions the intellectual (phenomenology and Foucault) has been as a falsify of the new humanities, and Obtaining the indigenous science. The findings also indicate that the indigenous point of the human sciences has been that Iranian theorists have been focusing on the critique of their inspirational paradigm to other approaches to human sciences, and these critiques are considered to be hesitations and weaknesses in the humanities, and they have conceptualized indigenous knowledge for the treatment and improvement of these gaps and critiques. Conclusion: Today, humanities have been overcome in a concrete and abstract level, so that even if Iranian theorists have sought to expanded indigenous sciences (not indigenous humanities), they have been not way of excluding the Wrestle and critique of humanities. Iranian theorists in their approaches have shown that through and to the heart of the humanities that indigenous humanities is possible to create and expand.