METHODOLOGY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES
Year:2025 | Volume:31 | Issue:122|Papers Count:6

Introduction and Objectives: The transformation of humanities as a complex undertaking requires a conceptual framework or model for identification, evaluation, and decision-making. The foundational step in this process—as a prerequisite for transformation—involves the systematic examination, analysis, and classification of existing knowledge within these disciplines. Given that these fields are not operating in a vacuum but rather consist of well-established sciences across all domains, this work aims to: 1. Provide precise awareness of existing scholarly achievements, 2. Establish coherence within these disciplines, 3. Present a comprehensive model that reveals gaps, 4. Guide future research directions, and 5. Assist scholars in selecting appropriate methodological pathways. "Reengineering the humanities" thus constitutes the critical first step toward substantive transformation. Focusing specifically on management science as a case study within the humanities, this research seeks to reengineer its thematic structure and classify its accumulated knowledge through a predetermined evolutionary research methodology. The resulting framework—derived from a meta-analysis of management literature—serves as both a diagnostic tool for mapping existing knowledge and a prescriptive model for identifying systemic deficiencies. This approach resolves the cognitive dissonance often experienced by non-specialists while providing a holistic understanding of management science for those outside its immediate academic sphere. Methodology: The preliminary phase employed conventional academic research methods grounded in an interpretive philosophical paradigm (per Saunders' research onion model), utilizing qualitative-descriptive methods with inductive reasoning. Thematic analysis was applied for data processing and pattern identification. The core phase implemented Evolutionary Research Methodology (ERM)—a novel approach rooted in the philosophy of Wilayat-based systems (as developed by the late Allameh Seyyed Munir al-Din Husseini). This methodology: * Originates from irreducible religious axioms and value commitments * Utilizes self-evident conceptual foundations * Generates empirically actionable interventions Through ERM, codes derived from the preliminary phase were systematized into three core categories (Action, Subject, and Objective). These were further integrated into a broader taxonomy comprising: 1. Intra-scientific dimensions (the core triad above) 2. Extra-scientific foundations (underlying principles, schools of thought, theories) 3. Relational dynamics (emergence, change, evolution) This tripartite structure (depicted in Table 1) reengineers management science into 27 discrete thematic domains, revealing both developed knowledge areas and underexplored/absent research territories. Results: The ERM-driven classification system: * Identifies 27 distinct research domains within management science * Reveals knowledge gaps requiring completion or revision * Highlights entirely unexplored research areas * Demonstrates how higher-order layers (principles → schools → theories) influence core elements (Action/Subject/Objective) The symbolic model presented in the concluding section illustrates how foundational changes (e. g., anthropological assumptions in organizational sociology) cascade through all levels of scientific structure. For instance, prevailing paradigms that reductively focus on material dimensions of human nature inevitably constrain subsequent theoretical developments and practical applications in management. Discussion and Conclusion: This study establishes comprehensive classification of existing knowledge as the essential precondition for humanities transformation. The proposed "Reengineering of Thematic Structures" through ERM achieves exhaustive coverage—no substantive aspect of the discipline remains unaccounted for in the final model. Key contributions include:   1. A diagnostic framework mapping knowledge positions and neglected research frontiers 2. Demonstration of how foundational principles (particularly anthropological assumptions) etermine downstream theoretical and practical outcomes. 3. Empirical validation through application to management science The study concludes that strategic interventions at the foundational level (e. g., redefining human ontology) represent critical leverage points for substantive transformation, as these necessarily reshape schools of thought, theories, and ultimately, practical applications.

Introduction and Objectives: Islamic management, with its emphasis on ethical values, material-spiritual balance, and Sharia-based decision-making, distinguishes itself from conventional management, which prioritizes financial profit, hierarchical structures, and short-term outcomes. This approach promotes ethical leadership, social responsibility, and long-term thinking, whereas conventional management focuses primarily on technical development. Due to the dispersion of studies, Islamic management faces challenges in gaining international acceptance. Islamic philosophy, with its rich logic and theoretical depth, can serve as a competitive foundation against modern and postmodern philosophies, reinforcing Islamic management theories. Since the Islamic Revolution, Persian-language research in this field has expanded, yet questions remain unanswered, such as the contribution of Islamic studies to global management literature and the quality of their impact. An analysis of 3, 722 records in Scopus indicates a substantial volume of studies in this domain, however, systematizing concepts and presenting a research-based framework is essential. This study, serving as a prerequisite for future credible research in this field, aims to identify key themes, clarify core concepts, introduce methodologies employed in related studies, and provide an analysis of leading countries and prominent authors in this area. The ultimate goal is to introduce Islamic management as a coherent and effective academic discipline to the international scholarly community. The primary research question guiding this study is: What insights does a revisitation of studies on the impact of "Islam" on "management" at the international level yield? This question was formulated and refined through a review of existing literature, consultations with experts, and an examination of international scholarship on Islamic management. By introducing and analyzing Islamic management theories at the international level and presenting theoretical and applied research, this study seeks to pave the way for the theoretical and practical expansion of Islamic management studies, advancing the field from a subjective (doctrinal) stage to an objective (scientific) one. Methodology: This study begins by addressing key questions, such as the nature of Islam, management, and how Islam influences managerial components, before solidifying the research problem. To address this problem, an appropriate research method was selected. A systematic review was employed due to its precise and replicable structure, which holds significant importance in the humanities, particularly management. Given the breadth of the research question, a scoping review—a type of systematic review—was chosen. This method is useful for comprehensively examining scientific literature, identifying research gaps, and laying the groundwork for future studies. Additionally, a scoping review provides an overview of the state of related research and establishes a suitable theoretical framework for knowledge development. In this study, preliminary steps for the scoping review—including an examination of prior review studies, the scope of the research question, and the adequacy of information sources—were carefully considered. A total of 232 management-related terms and 94 Islam-related terms were extracted, with 31 keywords ultimately selected based on expert consensus. The search query was constructed using a combination of these terms and logical operators. To ensure comprehensive coverage, the timeframe was restricted to 1970–2023, and only English-language publications were included. Reputable databases such as ScienceDirect, Scopus, Emerald, ProQuest, and ResearchGate were used for sourcing. Screening was conducted using 19 filters, assessing relevance based on titles, abstracts, and, in some cases, full-text evaluations. From an initial pool of 3, 722 studies, 1, 919 met the inclusion criteria, representing the breadth of international research on the influence of Islam on management. Results: The final dataset encompasses a wide range of topics related to Islamic business and management, including marketing, finance, human resources, and knowledge management. The collected sources—comprising journal articles, book chapters, and conference papers—exhibit considerable geographical diversity. Studies in this field were classified into nine major themes: 1. Islamic business ethics 2. Islamic marketing 3. Islamic management principles 4. Work ethics 5. Human capital development 6. Risk management 7. Spirituality and business 8. Consumer protection for Muslims (Halal certification) 9. Islamic organizational knowledge These themes emerged from an analysis of 142 key concepts extracted from the studies. Geographically, countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the United States, and the United Kingdom lead in knowledge production in this field. Indonesia has been active in emerging topics like Islamic leadership and workplace ethics, while Malaysia is a pioneer in Islamic finance. The U. S. holds a significant position due to its high number of publications and authors. Research networks indicate that Malaysia and Indonesia have the most international collaborations, whereas countries like Iran, Germany, and China have limited engagement. Egypt, Pakistan, and Iran are among the early contributors, while Indonesia and India are newer entrants. Methodologically, qualitative approaches dominate, with tools such as interviews and questionnaires being the most frequently used. Additionally, 14 leading authors in this field were identified, with Mohammad Kabir Hassan topping the list with 34 publications on Islamic finance. The year 2022 marked the highest productivity, with 443 articles published in 75 academic journals. Discussion and Conclusion: Research on the influence of Islam on management is not new. Based on the collected data, such studies began before 1970 and continued through 2023. This study demonstrates that Islamic teachings have played a significant and impactful role in global management and can be effectively applied to enhance organizational performance. Islamic management principles are grounded in reliable logic and closely align with management science and human nature. Thus, these teachings can benefit various business and management domains, regardless of an organization’s religious orientation. Additionally, the study reveals that materialistic Western management principles can be integrated with Islamic thought, enriching management knowledge by incorporating both material and spiritual dimensions. For instance, Islamic motivational theories are more comprehensive than Western models (e. g., Maslow, McClelland, Freud), which primarily emphasize material aspects. Similarly, Islamic employment relations extend beyond formal and psychological contracts by incorporating religious dimensions. A growing trend in the early 21st century involves empirical validation of Islamic management principles in organizational settings. The hypothesis that Islamic teachings are beneficial in business irrespective of religious orientation opens new research avenues, contributing further to management knowledge. The findings highlight the importance of integrating Islamic principles and values into managerial and organizational practices, demonstrating that alignment with Islamic teachings can positively influence management. This study provides a foundation for deeper research in this field and underscores the increasing growth of Islamic management studies, emphasizing the need for systematic investigations.

Introduction and Objectives: One of the fundamental issues in the philosophy of science and economic science is the analysis of the role of models in economic theorization. In economics, models are conceptual and mathematical tools used to simplify, explain, and predict economic phenomena. Despite their importance, there are divergent perspectives on models. Some view modeling as an extension of the mathematization of economics and criticize it, while others employ modeling in economic analyses without examining its theoretical foundations. Therefore, a philosophical analysis of modeling in Islamic economics is essential. The foundations of Islamic philosophers, due to their theoretical rigor and compatibility with Islamic economics, can play a key role in explaining the position of models. This paper seeks to provide a theoretical framework for Islamic economics by examining the nature, position, and role of models. To this end, it first explores models in the philosophy of science and economics, then analyzes their place in Islamic economics based on the principles of Islamic philosophers. The novelty of this research lies in its examination of the theoretical status of models in Islamic economics based on Islamic philosophical foundations and its proposal of a structured modeling approach.Methodology: This study employs a library-based data collection method and combines historical and rational analytical approaches. The historical method is used to examine the status of modeling in conventional economics, reviewing existing practices and various theories on the nature and function of models. In contrast, the rational method is applied to analyze the position of models in Islamic economics. This approach, grounded in the principles of Islamic philosophers, seeks to provide a coherent explanation of modeling consistent with Islamic economics. Key concepts such as iʿtibāriyyāt (conventional constructs) and ṣūrat-i ʿilmī (scientific form) are drawn from Islamic philosophy and applied to economic modeling. Additionally, the functions of models in Islamic economics are categorized into explanatory, prescriptive, and policy models, and a logical framework for their use is developed. Finally, the proposed framework is applied to the Justice-Barakah Model to assess its practical applicability.Results: The findings indicate that models in Islamic economics can be explained through concepts from Islamic philosophy, such as iʿtibāriyyāt and ṣūrat-i ʿilmī. Unlike conventional views that see models merely as abstract tools for simplification, Islamic philosophical frameworks treat models as epistemic constructs—either singular or composite mental representations—intended to depict reality or bring about external change. Ontologically, they are a form of "claimed mental existence" designed by scholars to better understand theories, concepts, and their interrelations. Thus, models possess both epistemological and ontological dimensions, blending truth and conventionality, with the dominance of one aspect determining their type. Accordingly, models are theoretical, reductive, and declarative tools that assist Islamic economic theorists in conceptualization.Islamic economic models are classified into three categories:1. Explanatory models, which depict existing economic realities and focus on understanding current conditions.2. Prescriptive models, which outline ideal objectives and relationships based on Islamic principles, offering templates for an ideal society.3. Policy models, which propose strategies to achieve prescriptive goals, with success measured by their effectiveness in meeting those objectives.A critical insight is the use of iʿtibāriyyāt (conventional constructs) and simplification at all stages. A key contribution of this research is the redefinition of models in Islamic economics based on Islamic philosophical theory and the development of a structured modeling process. The study also demonstrates that the use of scientific models in Islamic economics is feasible, provided certain principles and limitations—such as maintaining the distinction between real and conventional aspects and preserving the model's intended purpose—are observed. Models can thus serve as tools for understanding, explanation, prescription, and policymaking in economic issues.Discussion and Conclusion: The analysis of models in economic science reveals their central role in explaining, analyzing, and predicting economic issues. In conventional economics, models are categorized into three main types:1. Theoretical-conceptual and mathematical models, used to formulate or finalize a theory.2. Econometric models, employed for empirical testing of theories.3. Policy models, which combine the first two types and are used to analyze policy impacts.In contrast, Islamic economics redefines models using philosophical concepts such as ṣūrat-i ʿilmī and iʿtibāriyyāt. This study shows that models in Islamic economics serve as tools for explanation, prescription, and policymaking and can be designed to align with Islamic principles. A key finding is the distinction between real representation and conventional representation in models, where Islamic economic models function as declarative and reductive theoretical tools to simplify understanding and visualize economic realities. Furthermore, the logical stages of modeling in Islamic economics—from foundational concept recognition to comprehensive policy formulation—are delineated. This framework can assist researchers and policymakers in designing practical and effective models to address economic challenges based on Islamic principles. Finally, the proposed stages are applied to the Justice-Barakah Model to demonstrate their feasibility and practical utility in Islamic economics.

Introduction: Ali Shariati (1933–1977), as one of the most prolific contemporary Muslim thinkers, has made significant contributions to the field of religious studies. Analyzing Shariati’s ideas from a sociological perspective is essential because his approach is often included in sociology curricula in Iranian universities, particularly in courses such as Social Theories of Muslim Thinkers, Historical Sociology, and Sociology of Religion. However, debates persist regarding whether his views can be classified as genuinely sociological—given his academic background and doctoral degree—or whether they should be considered social theories that operate outside formal sociological methodology. The distinction between sociological theory and social theory lies in the former’s development within academic sociology, grounded in scientific research methods, whereas the latter emerges from broader intellectual discourse, often as normative or ideological positions. Considering this distinction, the primary research question is: Did Shariati employ scientific sociological methods in his religious studies, thus producing sociological theory, or did he merely offer a social critique of Iranian and Islamic issues (particularly religious ones)? A secondary question follows: If his approach is indeed sociological, does it belong to the sociology of religion or historical sociology? This study aims to critically analyze Shariati’s key religious texts, assess the theoretical and methodological foundations of his approach, and identify its strengths and practical applications. Methodology: Using a documentary research method, this study systematically examines Shariati’s major religious works—such as Islamology, Ideology and Civilization, and others—where he explicitly discusses his methodological approach to studying religion. Through targeted theoretical sampling, the study extracts key concepts and themes, comparing them with foundational principles of the sociology of religion and historical sociology to evaluate the methodological rigor of his approach. Results: Shariati’s engagement with classical sociological theories (e. g., Durkheim, Weber, Marx)—despite occasional misinterpretations—demonstrates his familiarity with sociological frameworks. He frequently integrates, critiques, and reinterprets these theories, particularly Marx’s base/superstructure model. His primary focus, however, is a historical analysis of Islam, aimed at constructing his central thesis: "Return to the Self. " To achieve this, he develops a unique "conical model" to methodically compare the historical evolution of Christianity in Europe and Islam in West Asia. Given his systematic comparative analysis, his findings can be considered sociological in nature. Discussion and Conclusion: A crucial distinction exists between the sociology of religion (studying religion as a social phenomenon) and religious sociology (using metaphysical religious principles to analyze society). Shariati’s approach aligns more closely with the latter—specifically, a "theological sociology"—as he employs Islamic concepts (e. g., ummah, imamate, martyrdom, awaiting the Messiah) to interpret contemporary issues like democracy and populism. While he claims to practice a "sociology of religion" (e. g., framing tawhid [monotheism] as a historical and social construct rather than a theological absolute), his methodology is not methodologically atheistic. Instead, his dialectical framework (e. g., the "God-Clay" duality) underpins his entire theory, culminating in an ideal vision of "divine humanity. "In analyzing primitive religions, Shariati adopts Durkheim’s view of religion as a collective consciousness—yet only to support his thesis that "monotheism is the origin of religious insight. " He does not deny God’s existence but uses sociological analysis to affirm his theological stance, much like qualitative researchers ground their theories in existing frameworks. From a historical sociology perspective, Shariati not only employs historical data but also innovates a comparative method to analyze social transformations. His conical model identifies key elements of historical periods, enabling cross-cultural comparisons. For instance, he argues that Iran’s 20th-century condition parallels Europe’s 13th–14th centuries (the transition from feudalism to bourgeois modernity). This methodological contribution allows researchers to systematically compare historical processes, making his approach valuable for comparative historical sociology.

Introduction and Objectives: In today’s complex and ever-changing world, the need to reconsider research methods and knowledge production is more pressing than ever (Shay, 2017). Restricting researchers to conventional qualitative methods steers new inquiries toward familiar frameworks, limiting advanced insights (Mazy, 2021). Thus, there is a demand for revisiting and innovating qualitative research approaches to address emerging challenges and generate new knowledge that yields distinct outcomes. The portrait method, as a research approach, facilitates deep exploration and higher understanding. By transcending rigid boundaries and imposed definitions, it offers an elevated comprehension of phenomena, replacing repetitive knowledge with creative insights that align with humanistic and societal ideals. This method transforms context, voice, relationships, and emerging themes into an aesthetic unity for researchers, participants, and audiences. Our understanding of portraiture continues to evolve (Holt, 2023). Despite numerous developments and perspectives, a significant gap remains in comprehending how these changes affect public perception and acceptance of portraiture (Silva, 2021). For instance, gaps exist in the analysis of portrait art (Kitcher, 2023) and its psychological and social dimensions (Yousimaki, 2021). Existing research in this field has substantial shortcomings in uncovering identity and emotions (Pful, 2021). As it stands, the gaps in contemporary portrait studies are vast, necessitating deeper research opportunities (Rabetsva, 2021). Engaging with this method requires sensitivity, empathy, and tolerance for ambiguity in both process and outcomes (Jangvard, 2015). Accordingly, this paper seeks to introduce the concept of portraiture, its advantages and characteristics, and its application principles (community, sampling, data collection, analysis, and validation) in humanities and social sciences research, particularly in educational management. Research Method: This study aims to explore portrait research methodology and employs a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were collected through a literature review, examining articles, academic documents, and primary sources on portraiture. The research was designed in several stages to provide a deeper understanding of this novel research approach. First, the concept of portraiture was described and explained, with a comprehensive review of key definitions and related concepts. Next, the core principles of the portrait method were examined, including participant voice reflection, the process of portrait formation in research, portrait analysis, validity in portraiture, and its use in educational settings. Finally, a summary of findings was discussed in the conclusion. This study offers a coherent and systematic analysis of portrait methodology, providing new insights in the field. As such, it serves as a valuable resource for researchers and students interested in innovative methods and restructuring existing frameworks. Findings: Key findings from portrait research include: a) Reflecting Participant Voices: In portraiture, participants are active contributors to knowledge production, addressing societal needs. Knowledge is gathered through artistic and creative collaboration, stimulating active engagement. Researchers allow experiences to be described in ways influenced by political, economic, and cultural structures, fostering transformative change. The potential for decolonizing knowledge production leads to transformative learning. b) The Portrait Formation Process in Research: Portraiture is useful for exploring contextual relationships, documenting processes, and enabling researchers to engage with personal narratives in critical aspects of inquiry. The proposed analytical strategy serves two functions: detailing stories to illustrate processes and contexts, and revealing underlying causes and effects. Analytical steps include coding for characters, time, place, conditions, key events, and common themes (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020). c) Portrait Analysis: Data analysis in portraiture involves four stages after repeated engagement with participant voices: (1) receiving the story, (2) constructing poetry, (3) listening to opposing voices, and (4) writing the report (McCarthy, 2017). This interpretive balance between participant narratives and researcher reflections acknowledges participants as experts in their own lives (Anderson, 2012). This methodological effort to balance researcher interpretation with lived experience expertise defines narrative portraiture (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020). d) Validity in Portraiture: Ensuring integrity in portrait research rests with the researcher. Unlike quantitative research, where the investigator remains detached and objective, qualitative research—particularly portraiture—involves negotiation, proximity, and relational dynamics. According to Lightfoot (2005), crafting narrative portraits is a consultative, highly creative process requiring deep and flexible insight. Vital dynamics exist between documentation and narrative creation, reception and shaping, reflection and imposition, and improvisation. Coherence must emerge organically and interpretively (Lightfoot, 2005). e) Portraiture in Educational Settings: This method explores unique perspectives inaccessible through other research approaches, such as empirical studies. In portraiture, voices are discovered with varying degrees of constraint or presence, encompassing witnessing, interpretation, self-narration, and dialogue. These forms emerge through intersubjective relationships between researchers and participants in educational contexts (Rodríguez-Durán & Jacobs, 2020). Discussion and Conclusion: Significant historical adaptations have been made to align with social, cultural, and technological developments (Stein, 2023). In 21st-century research, we have expanded our discourse to conceptualize data as stories, drawing from cross-cultural processes that emphasize collaboration in narrative construction (Woffen & Pickford, 2021). Portrait research primarily views inquiry as a tool for social change, emphasizing strengths and learning opportunities while minimizing the influence of socio-cultural, historical, and political contexts. This approach translates data into compelling, accessible narratives that resonate beyond academia. Each portrait emerges with its own meaning, learned through the images it creates. When shared with participants, their interpretations of lived experiences become evident. Researchers gain self-awareness through participant responses, perceiving themselves in varied and metaphorical ways. Portrait research resists conventional judgments, instead offering an art-based, phenomenological structure that provides rich interpretations of lived experiences. It occupies a middle ground between precision and quality, valuing portraiture as an unconventional yet meaningful companion in research.

Introduction and Objectives: A deep understanding of social and cultural phenomena in today’s complex world is crucial. Qualitative research, with its focus on lived experiences and constructed meanings, opens a window into these complexities. Qualitative data, particularly in social, cultural, and educational fields, require deeper analytical methods due to their multifaceted and ambiguous nature. Deconstruction, as an innovative approach, enables a more comprehensive examination of phenomena by challenging their various dimensions. It critiques the myth of textual "clarity" and exposes hidden aspects of philosophical traditions.Deconstruction is a facet of metaphysical critique that interrogates structures, origins, and the role of authoritative centers. Derridean deconstruction is not destruction; rather, rooted in Jacques Derrida’s thought, it engages with concepts such as decentering, différance, and the play of meaning to critique logocentrism. By destabilizing fixed meanings, Derrida opens the door to multiple interpretations, arguing that every text reflects the presence of the "Other," which is key to understanding meaning.Despite its high potential, applying deconstruction in qualitative research faces challenges, including conceptual complexity, ambiguity in implementation, and the need for precise interpretation. Thus, developing an operational framework and practical strategies for deconstruction in qualitative research is essential.This study aims to explore the methodological application of deconstruction in qualitative data analysis and propose an operational framework, addressing questions about methods, tools, advantages, challenges, and applications of deconstruction in qualitative research—particularly in social, cultural, and educational domains. The central research question is: How can deconstruction facilitate more precise analysis and interpretation of qualitative data? The ultimate goal is to provide strategies for effectively employing deconstruction to achieve a deeper understanding of phenomena.Method: This study examines deconstruction as an innovative approach to qualitative data analysis, particularly in social, cultural, and educational research. The complexity of qualitative data necessitates deeper analytical methods, such as deconstruction, which reveals hidden assumptions, internal contradictions, and power relations, enabling multifaceted and critical analysis. By reviewing the philosophical foundations of deconstruction—especially Derrida’s ideas—and proposing an operational framework, this study addresses methodological questions, tools, benefits, challenges, and applications of deconstruction in qualitative research.A systematic search of Persian-language scholarly databases was conducted using keywords such as "deconstruction," "qualitative research," "Derrida," "critical analysis," "educational management," and "meaning." Inclusion criteria were Persian-language articles on deconstruction in qualitative research. After screening titles and abstracts, 21 articles were selected for full review. Findings indicate that deconstruction, by challenging fixed meanings, enhances the understanding of social and cultural phenomena and contributes to the development of new theories.In educational management, deconstruction critically analyzes curricula, policies, and evaluation processes, challenging conventional beliefs and fostering more equitable, learner-centered systems. For instance, deconstructing the concept of "grades" in academic assessment reveals that grades alone cannot comprehensively measure learning; attention to other dimensions—such as creativity, critical thinking, social skills, and problem-solving—is essential.However, the complexity of deconstruction necessitates adequate training, practice, and contextual sensitivity. As a complementary approach, deconstruction strengthens critical thinking and facilitates positive transformations in the humanities. This study provides a comprehensive understanding of deconstruction by examining its strengths and weaknesses and exploring its relationship with other qualitative methods.Results: Findings demonstrate that deconstruction, by destabilizing fixed meanings, enables a deeper understanding of social, cultural, and educational phenomena and supports the development of novel theoretical frameworks. By exposing hidden assumptions, power dynamics, and textual contradictions, deconstruction facilitates multiple interpretations and innovative analyses.In educational management, deconstruction critiques curricula, policies, and evaluation practices, challenging dominant paradigms and promoting more equitable systems. For example, deconstructing "grading" reveals its limitations as a sole measure of learning, emphasizing the need to assess creativity, critical thinking, and problem-solving.Additionally, deconstruction aids researchers in humanities disciplines—such as literature, philosophy, cultural studies, and social sciences—by enhancing their understanding of textual and social complexities. It enables critical analysis of concepts, discourses, and power structures, paving the way for positive social and educational change. Specifically, this study illustrates how deconstruction uncovers hidden dimensions of qualitative data, offering a more holistic understanding of phenomena.Moreover, findings highlight deconstruction’s potential as a tool for empowering marginalized groups and amplifying underrepresented voices. Ultimately, this study positions deconstruction as a complementary qualitative method that enriches phenomenological understanding.Discussion and Conclusion: The analysis concludes that deconstruction is not only a novel tool for rethinking intellectual structures but also a means of breaking fixed interpretative molds. Results confirm that this approach enables researchers to disentangle complex concepts from traditional perspectives and offer deeper critiques. By emphasizing the fluidity of meaning and dismantling rigid frameworks, deconstruction fosters interdisciplinary opportunities, advances critical knowledge, and expands new theories.In social and educational contexts, deconstruction transforms textual and structural critiques, revealing hidden operational effects and providing robust evidence for reconstructing justice-oriented frameworks. By delegating interpretive responsibility to readers and encouraging intellectual engagement, deconstruction balances critique and reconstruction. It also facilitates adaptable knowledge in shifting historical, linguistic, and cultural contexts, addressing conceptual challenges with fresh perspectives.Overall, findings suggest that deconstruction, due to its capacity for theoretical revision and analytical flexibility, can serve as a complementary qualitative method. These results promise advancements in critical methodologies, with the proposed operational framework opening new horizons in humanities research. Future studies could explore deconstruction’s role in empowering marginalized groups and driving social change.Acknowledgments: We sincerely thank our esteemed professors for their invaluable guidance and support, which have been instrumental in our academic progress.Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no financial, personal, or professional conflicts of interest in this study, which was conducted transparently.