The emergence of genetic science and the research on the human genome and the new functions that make up this new subject have created a range of discussions between experts and jurisprudents, and since jurisprudence has the ability to respond to the issues that are under investigation, This issue is also necessary for the views of the jurists to be considered. Referring to the views expressed by the jurisprudents, there are various statements ranging from consent to opposition to such actions. Among these, the arguments for the opposition to express their opposition to the particular effects on it and the type of reasoning presented are of particular importance. . What this research seeks to answer is, on the one hand, to explain the approach of jurists to this issue and, on the other hand, to discover why some scholars oppose genetic research. Findings of the research indicate that the reasons for the adversaries have a stronger position, although there are disagreements among the adherents, and what is presented as a reason for opposition from the opponents of genetic actions is a legal concern, rather than a reason, Because research on the human genome is not in the limelight in the form of initial titles, and if the issue of abusing the permits of such actions is posed, it is another issue that opponents follow from the interpretation of the Convention that has the negative consequences of such actions Emphasizing that by preventing the potential misuse of this There is a background and there is more evidence that the arguments of the opponents of genetic actions can be ruled out.