EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANN) IN PREDICTING THE DAILY GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION AND COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE ANGSTROM MODEL (CASE STUDY: TABRIZ SYNOPTIC STATION)

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SABZIPARVAR ALI AKBAR; OLYAIE EHSAN

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS Year:2011 | Volume:5 | Issue:3 Page(s): 30-41

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

944

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANN) IN PREDICTING THE DAILY GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION AND COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE ANGSTROM MODEL (CASE STUDY: TABRIZ SYNOPTIC STATION)

Author(s)

SABZIPARVAR ALI AKBAR | OLYAIE EHSAN | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

PREDICTIONQ2

GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATIONQ2

ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKSQ2

ANGS MODELQ2

TABRIZQ3

Abstract

Global Solar Radiation (GSR) is one of the most widely used parameters in many fields of agriculture engineering, meteorology, and hydrology. To design a reliable solar energy system, knowledge of the radiation data is essential. Because of high costs of maintenance, calibration, and measurement of GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION, the application of commonly used radiation methods such as Angstrom models has become popular. In spite of the simplicity and advantages of Angstrom models, there are many weaknesses in this simple model which may result in unreliable PREDICTIONs. For instance, Angstrom models ignore some important factors such as site elevation, relative humidity, and atmospheric turbidity. Since 1924, many attempts have been made for solving such difficulties. During recent years, numerous works have attempted to develop statistical methods, physical approaches (Sabziparvar, 2008), empirical relations, and artificial neural network (ANN) models to predict GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION around the world. Sozen et al. (2005) simulated GSR in different sites in Turkey with an error of less than 10%. Using air temperature and relative humidity data, Rehman & Mohandes (2008) predicted GSR using an ANN method. Jiang (2009) compared the GSR as predicted by empirical approaches with the GSR as simulated by ANN methods in different sites in China. They showed that ANN results are more accurate than empirical methods. In the semi-arid region of Ahwaz, Rahimikhoob (2010) predicted GSR using air temperature and the ANN method. In the present study, an ANN model was constructed to predict GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION and the results were compared to the results of an Angstrom model. For this purpose, daily meteorological and climatic parameters (relative humidity, mean temperature, maximum temperature, minimum temperature, soil ground temperature, sunshine duration, GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION, cloud cover, and vapor pressure) which affect solar radiation at the TABRIZ Synoptic Station during a period of five years (2001-2005) were selected as the input of the neural network method. Three statistical criteria including the mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), and correlation coefficient (r) were applied. The results showed that the best model performance is a 9-11-1 structure and the sigmoid function based on the back propagation training algorithm. The minimum error was obtained by using 10, 000 iterations for the training stage and 11 neurons in hidden layers. This study used the trial and error method to find the optimum number of hidden layers. Changing the number of neurons from one to eight in a hidden layer led to larger errors. The application of 9 to 12 neurons improved the results significantly, but higher numbers of neurons (n>13) resulted in error divergence. Generally, the comparison of neural network performance results and Angstrom model results versus actual measured values revealed a significant superiority of the neural network model compared to the conventional Angstrom method. Therefore, the proposed method can be a useful tool for the estimation of daily GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION in areas where direct measurement of radiation is not available. The suggested ANN method can be a good candidate instead of the commonly used Angstrom method. Due to the sensitivity of weather parameters to climate conditions, different ANN methods have to be tested for PREDICTION of GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION for other climates.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SABZIPARVAR, ALI AKBAR, & OLYAIE, EHSAN. (2011). EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANN) IN PREDICTING THE DAILY GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION AND COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE ANGSTROM MODEL (CASE STUDY: TABRIZ SYNOPTIC STATION). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS, 5(3), 30-41. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/133931/en

Vancouver: Copy

SABZIPARVAR ALI AKBAR, OLYAIE EHSAN. EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANN) IN PREDICTING THE DAILY GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION AND COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE ANGSTROM MODEL (CASE STUDY: TABRIZ SYNOPTIC STATION). IRANIAN JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS[Internet]. 2011;5(3):30-41. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/133931/en

IEEE: Copy

ALI AKBAR SABZIPARVAR, and EHSAN OLYAIE, “EVALUATION OF THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS (ANN) IN PREDICTING THE DAILY GLOBAL SOLAR RADIATION AND COMPARISON WITH RESULTS FROM THE ANGSTROM MODEL (CASE STUDY: TABRIZ SYNOPTIC STATION),” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICS, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 30–41, 2011, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/133931/en

Related Journal Papers