Using DEMATEL to Evaluation model of Students' Architectural Design Projects

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

Ahadi Parisa

Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: HOVIATESHAHR Year:2018 | Volume:12 | Issue:33 Page(s): 75-88

Download Full-Text

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

View:

483

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Using DEMATEL to Evaluation model of Students' Architectural Design Projects

Author(s)

Ahadi Parisa | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

Evaluation modelQ1

Design processQ1

Design productQ2

DEMATELQ1

Abstract

Evaluation in art and architecture are more difficult than other majors and fields. Grading System of architectural design projects based on exact criteria could be the most important educational goal. There are problems in evaluation system due to a lack of common terminology, and etc. So need for developing a method for common criteria scale for project assessment decisions has arisen. Distinction effective criteria in evaluation of architectural design projects and to determine their impact are main issues in this research. So, criteria including effective quality in all aspects of Design process and Design product were selected in two groups: Design process and Design product. Criteria for judging Design process includes knowledge of design, design skills and advancing the design. As well as evaluation criteria related to Design product, includes design preparations, elements of design and design documentation. DEMATEL is a comprehensive tool for building and analyzing a structural model involving causal relationships between complex factors. DEMATEL has been used to research on and solve a group of complicated and intertwined problems. The methodology, according to the concrete characteristics of objective affairs, can confirm the interdependence among the variables/attributes, and restrict the relationship reflecting the characteristic with an essential system and development trend. This study aims to utilize DEMATEL in the Evaluation model of architectural design projects. The DEMATEL process can be summarized by the following steps: Calculate the average matrix, calculate the direct influence matrix, and compute the total relation matrix. After selecting the criteria, each of these criteria in terms of importance, should be given appropriate weight. For this purpose, the number of teachers have been asked to score the criteria between 0 and 10 points. After reviewing the questionnaire of DEMATEL technique and the importance of criteria Matrix, criteria weights were obtained. Total relation matrix shows the impact of each criteria and rank their importance in evaluating design projects. In order to separate the effectiveness of criteria in Design process and Design product, DEMATEL process was again used for each group separately. The results of this process includes determinate criteria effectiveness and ranking of the Design process and Design product. After summarizing weight of Design product and Design process evaluation criteria, their impact can be calculated separately. Comparing results of two DEMATEL process parts shows little difference in criteria effectiveness and ranking. In addition, in results of total relation matrix for all criteria "inquiring mind in study to design course" has highest and "adherence to a specific Design process" has the least impact; in results of total relation matrix for criteria of Design process, "inquiring mind in study to design course" has highest and "adherence to a specific Design process" has least impact; in results of total relation matrix for criteria of Design product, "project documents quality and principles of drawing" has highest and "regarding the studies and physical planning" has least impact. The results of ranking six groups of criteria indicate that design knowledge and design preparations have the most and the least effect on the final evaluation of projects, respectively.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

Ahadi, Parisa. (2018). Using DEMATEL to Evaluation model of Students' Architectural Design Projects. HOVIATESHAHR, 12(33 ), 75-88. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/154747/en

Vancouver: Copy

Ahadi Parisa. Using DEMATEL to Evaluation model of Students' Architectural Design Projects. HOVIATESHAHR[Internet]. 2018;12(33 ):75-88. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/154747/en

IEEE: Copy

Parisa Ahadi, “Using DEMATEL to Evaluation model of Students' Architectural Design Projects,” HOVIATESHAHR, vol. 12, no. 33 , pp. 75–88, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/154747/en

Related Journal Papers