COMPARING X-BRACES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF STEEL BUILDING CODE, QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SAMI HABIB; ZAHRAEI SEYED MAHDI

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal Year:2010 | Volume:44 | Issue:2 Page(s): 193-204

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

770

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARING X-BRACES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF STEEL BUILDING CODE, QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES

Author(s)

SAMI HABIB | ZAHRAEI SEYED MAHDI | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

QUICK EVALUATIONQ3

LIFE SAFETY PERFORMANCE LEVELQ3

ACCEPTANCE CRITERIAQ3

X-BRACESQ2

COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATIONQ3

Abstract

In this paper, ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA of steel building code, comprehensive and QUICK EVALUATION procedures for X-bracing, are compared to each other parametrically and numerically. For this purpose, it is assumed first that the sample building is designed to meet steel building code and then by introducing transform parameters and using stress ratio of the designed components, acceptance of the designed building for LIFE SAFETY PERFORMANCE LEVEL is investigated. X-bracing ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA are studied using the new method and a list of differences for 2, 4, 6 & 8 story buildings is prepared in details. Results show that almost 5% of X-braced samples designed based on steel building code are rejected by comprehensive and quick seismic evaluation. On the other hand, some rejected components based on steel building code, meet comprehensive and QUICK EVALUATION procedures. Furthermore, by using a similar method and assuming that building components meet quick evaluation, their acceptance possibility by COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION is investigated. Based on acquired results, almost 50% of X-BRACES meeting quick evaluation, are rejected by COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION. In contrast, some rejected samples by QUICK EVALUATION meet COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION procedure.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SAMI, HABIB, & ZAHRAEI, SEYED MAHDI. (2010). COMPARING X-BRACES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF STEEL BUILDING CODE, QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES. CIVIL ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURES JOURNAL (CEIJ) (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING), 44(2), 193-204. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/166591/en

Vancouver: Copy

SAMI HABIB, ZAHRAEI SEYED MAHDI. COMPARING X-BRACES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF STEEL BUILDING CODE, QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES. CIVIL ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURES JOURNAL (CEIJ) (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING)[Internet]. 2010;44(2):193-204. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/166591/en

IEEE: Copy

HABIB SAMI, and SEYED MAHDI ZAHRAEI, “COMPARING X-BRACES ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA OF STEEL BUILDING CODE, QUICK AND COMPREHENSIVE SEISMIC EVALUATION PROCEDURES,” CIVIL ENGINEERING INFRASTRUCTURES JOURNAL (CEIJ) (JOURNAL OF FACULTY OF ENGINEERING), vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 193–204, 2010, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/166591/en

Related Journal Papers