A COMPARISON OF TWO BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR THE FLUID FLOW SIMULATION IN A STIRRED TANK

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

NAGHAVI S.M.; ASHRAFIZAADEH M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING (ESTEGHLAL) Year:2014 | Volume:33 | Issue:1 Page(s): 15-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

792

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARISON OF TWO BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR THE FLUID FLOW SIMULATION IN A STIRRED TANK

Author(s)

NAGHAVI S.M. | ASHRAFIZAADEH M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHODQ1

STIRRED TANKQ2

TURBULENT FLOWQ2

BOUNCE BACKQ2

PARALLEL PROGRAMMINGQ2

Abstract

Three dimensional TURBULENT FLOW in a STIRRED TANK with moving blades has been numerically studied. For the numerical simulation, a 3D parallel flow solver has been developed based on the LATTICE BOLTZMANN METHOD. The large eddy simulation method has been used for the turbulence modeling. To improve the accuracy of the flow simulation in STIRRED TANKs, a commonly used boundary condition for moving walls as well as a proposed alternative boundary condition have been investigated in great details. The present investigations show that the proposed improved bounce-back method generates accurate results compared with those obtained using commonly used force field method. However, the implementation of the proposed boundary condition is more difficult for cases with complex moving walls.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

NAGHAVI, S.M., & ASHRAFIZAADEH, M.. (2014). A COMPARISON OF TWO BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR THE FLUID FLOW SIMULATION IN A STIRRED TANK. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING (ESTEGHLAL), 33(1), 15-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/173631/en

Vancouver: Copy

NAGHAVI S.M., ASHRAFIZAADEH M.. A COMPARISON OF TWO BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR THE FLUID FLOW SIMULATION IN A STIRRED TANK. JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING (ESTEGHLAL)[Internet]. 2014;33(1):15-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/173631/en

IEEE: Copy

S.M. NAGHAVI, and M. ASHRAFIZAADEH, “A COMPARISON OF TWO BOUNDARY CONDITIONS FOR THE FLUID FLOW SIMULATION IN A STIRRED TANK,” JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING (ESTEGHLAL), vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 15–30, 2014, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/173631/en

Related Journal Papers