EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND POROUS BURNERS IN APPROPRIATE POWER FOR DOMESTIC USE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MAEREFAT MEHDI; NOORIAN SAJJAD

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Modares Mechanical Engineering Year:2017 | Volume:16 | Issue:12 Page(s): 657-664

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

595

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND POROUS BURNERS IN APPROPRIATE POWER FOR DOMESTIC USE

Author(s)

MAEREFAT MEHDI | NOORIAN SAJJAD | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

POROUS BURNERQ2

EMISSIONSQ1

EFFICIENCYQ1

STOVEQ1

CONVENTIONAL BURNERQ1

Abstract

In this paper, experimental comparison between CONVENTIONAL BURNER and POROUS BURNER in domestic purposes as STOVE, according to Iranian National Standard No.10325 has been carried out. This comparison between the CONVENTIONAL BURNER available in the Iranian market and its equivalent POROUS BURNER is done. First, flammability of the porous silicon carbide burner was investigated. The results showed that the flame is formed when the equivalence ratio is less than 1, so the best performance equivalence ratio was around 0.7. By changing the distance between the pot and the burner and also changing the pot diameter, it was found that for a pot with 26 cm diameter and burner distance of 1 cm, POROUS BURNER EFFICIENCY increases to 55%. The comparison between the CONVENTIONAL BURNER and optimum situation POROUS BURNER showed that at the same factors like power, distance between the pot and the burner, the pot diameter, the burner diameter, measuring tools and the same method, POROUS BURNER EFFICIENCY is 1.5 times more than CONVENTIONAL BURNER. In CONVENTIONAL BURNERs CO and NOX pollutant are 8-26 and 8 times more than POROUS BURNERs. Due to higher EFFICIENCY and lower EMISSIONS, CONVENTIONAL BURNERs can supersede POROUS BURNERs for domestic purposes.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MAEREFAT, MEHDI, & NOORIAN, SAJJAD. (2017). EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND POROUS BURNERS IN APPROPRIATE POWER FOR DOMESTIC USE. MODARES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 16(12 ), 657-664. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/178185/en

Vancouver: Copy

MAEREFAT MEHDI, NOORIAN SAJJAD. EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND POROUS BURNERS IN APPROPRIATE POWER FOR DOMESTIC USE. MODARES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING[Internet]. 2017;16(12 ):657-664. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/178185/en

IEEE: Copy

MEHDI MAEREFAT, and SAJJAD NOORIAN, “EXPERIMENTAL COMPARISON OF EFFICIENCY AND POLLUTION OF CONVENTIONAL AND POROUS BURNERS IN APPROPRIATE POWER FOR DOMESTIC USE,” MODARES MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, vol. 16, no. 12 , pp. 657–664, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/178185/en

Related Journal Papers