COMPARISON OF MICROBIAL POPULATION IN RUMINAL FLUID OF SISTANI AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIFFERENT ROUGHAGES

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

MANSOURI H.; NIKKHAH A.; REZAEIAN M.; MIRHADI S.A.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Year:2006 | Volume:19 | Issue:3 (72 IN ANIMAL AND FISHERIES SCIENCES) Page(s): 66-73

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,192

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF MICROBIAL POPULATION IN RUMINAL FLUID OF SISTANI AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIFFERENT ROUGHAGES

Author(s)

MANSOURI H. | NIKKHAH A. | REZAEIAN M. | MIRHADI S.A. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CATTLEQ3

SISTANIQ3

((BOS INDICUS))Q2

HOLSTEIN (BOS TAURUS)Q4

RUMEN MICROBESQ3

Abstract

In order to compare rumen microbial population between SISTANI (Bos indicus) and Holstein (Bos taurus) breeds, three ruminaly fistulated SISTANI steers in Karaj (SK), three SISTANI steers in Zabol (SZ) and three Holstein steers in Karaj (HK) were used in a completely randomized design with factorial arrangement. These three groups of steer, in three different periods, fed three type of roughage diets including either alfalfa hay (ALF), Phragmites australis (PA) or wheat straw (WS). The feed offered twice a day (8:00 and 16:00) at about maintenance level of requirements. The total population of bacteria per ml of rumen liquor was not significantly different among the groups fed different diets. Feeding of PA did not affect the protozoa concentration in the rumen liquor of Holstein (2.28x 104) and SISTANI (3.00x104), but when the animals fed ALF or WS the total protozoa number (per ml of rumen liquor) of SZ were significantly (p<0.05) higher than SK and HK groups (5.19x104 vs 3.71x104 and 2.96x104 respectively). Also when animal received WS, total protozoa number of SZ were significantly (p< 0.05) higher than SK and HK groups (3.03x 104 vs 2.17x 104 and 2.00x 104 respectively). Holotrich protozoa number in three diets were significantly (p< 0.05) higher in SZ than the other groups. No significantly differences were observed among the groups for the density of ruminal anaerobic fungal zoospore. It can be concluded that, the Holstein steers could have better potential to digestion of ALF, whereas the SISTANI steers may ferment and digest PA and WS diets more efficiently.

Cites

THE COMPARISON OF IN VITRO DIGESTIBILITY OF WHEAT STRAW BY RUMEN ANAEROBIC FUNGI OF KHUZESTAN BUFFALO AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

MANSOURI, H., NIKKHAH, A., REZAEIAN, M., & MIRHADI, S.A.. (2006). COMPARISON OF MICROBIAL POPULATION IN RUMINAL FLUID OF SISTANI AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIFFERENT ROUGHAGES. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, 19(3 (72 IN ANIMAL AND FISHERIES SCIENCES)), 66-73. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/19747/en

Vancouver: Copy

MANSOURI H., NIKKHAH A., REZAEIAN M., MIRHADI S.A.. COMPARISON OF MICROBIAL POPULATION IN RUMINAL FLUID OF SISTANI AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIFFERENT ROUGHAGES. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI[Internet]. 2006;19(3 (72 IN ANIMAL AND FISHERIES SCIENCES)):66-73. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/19747/en

IEEE: Copy

H. MANSOURI, A. NIKKHAH, M. REZAEIAN, and S.A. MIRHADI, “COMPARISON OF MICROBIAL POPULATION IN RUMINAL FLUID OF SISTANI AND HOLSTEIN CATTLE FED DIFFERENT ROUGHAGES,” PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, vol. 19, no. 3 (72 IN ANIMAL AND FISHERIES SCIENCES), pp. 66–73, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/19747/en

Related Journal Papers