COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SOME LIQUID FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT FOR CONTROL OF WHEAT COMMON BUNT IN RAINFED AND IRRIGATED FIELDS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

BEHROUZIAN M.; ASADI P.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Year:2001 | Volume:14 | Issue:3 (IN NATURAL RESOURCES 52) Page(s): 28-30

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

850

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SOME LIQUID FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT FOR CONTROL OF WHEAT COMMON BUNT IN RAINFED AND IRRIGATED FIELDS

Author(s)

BEHROUZIAN M. | ASADI P. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

COMMON BUNTQ4

WHEATQ3

FUNGICIDEQ3

Abstract

During 1997-98, the effectiveness of 5 liquid FUNGICIDEs was compared in Azarbaijan and Kara 3. As irrigated and rainfed fields to control WHEAT COMMON BUNT. The FUNGICIDEs were: Triticonzole 200 FS in two rates: 12.5 and 20 ml, Imazalil 15% solution in etanol at the rate of 200 ml, do Diniconazole 2% at the rate of 100 ml Tebuconazole 60 FS at the rate of 50 ml and Vitavax 200 FF at the rate of 25ml, as commercial form for treatment 100Kg seeds. The experiments were laid out in complete randomized block design with 7 treatments and 4 replications. Percentage of infected spikes was calculated and means were compared using Duncan's Multiple Range Test. The results showed that in rainfed experiments all the FUNGICIDEs except. Imazalil were effective and controlled the disease. There were significant difference between the .sl FUNGICIDEs and the control and Imazalil, but there was no significant difference between Imazalil 3 and control. In irrigated arias the efficacy of Diniconazole, Triticonazole92 and tebuconazole were very high, Vitavax and triticonzole were high and there were significant differences between these FUNGICIDEs and the control and Imazalil. There was no significant difference between Imazalil and the control in irrigated arias.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

BEHROUZIAN, M., & ASADI, P.. (2001). COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SOME LIQUID FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT FOR CONTROL OF WHEAT COMMON BUNT IN RAINFED AND IRRIGATED FIELDS. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, 14(3 (IN NATURAL RESOURCES 52)), 28-30. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/19804/en

Vancouver: Copy

BEHROUZIAN M., ASADI P.. COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SOME LIQUID FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT FOR CONTROL OF WHEAT COMMON BUNT IN RAINFED AND IRRIGATED FIELDS. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI[Internet]. 2001;14(3 (IN NATURAL RESOURCES 52)):28-30. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/19804/en

IEEE: Copy

M. BEHROUZIAN, and P. ASADI, “COMPARISON OF EFFICACY OF SOME LIQUID FUNGICIDES AS SEED TREATMENT FOR CONTROL OF WHEAT COMMON BUNT IN RAINFED AND IRRIGATED FIELDS,” PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, vol. 14, no. 3 (IN NATURAL RESOURCES 52), pp. 28–30, 2001, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/19804/en

Related Journal Papers