COMPARISON OF IN VITRO AND IN SITU TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN SOME FEEDSTUFFS

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

ABDI BENMAR HOSSEIN; SOBHANI SENJABOD ABDOLAH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Research On Animal Production Year:2015 | Volume:5 | Issue:10 Page(s): 98-112

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,015

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF IN VITRO AND IN SITU TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN SOME FEEDSTUFFS

Author(s)

ABDI BENMAR HOSSEIN | SOBHANI SENJABOD ABDOLAH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

IN SITU METHODQ2

IN VITRO METHODQ2

DEGRADABILITYQ2

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare dry matter DEGRADABILITY of some feedstuffs including soybean meal, canola meal, barley grain, corn grain, alfalfa hay and corn silage by in vitro and in situ techniques. The IN VITRO METHOD includes the ruminal digestion stage of the in vitro dry matter digestibility technique. Significant differences were observed between two methods in the estimation of the immediately soluble fraction for all feedstuffs except for canola meal (P<0.05). Two methods had significant differences with each other for estimating the potentially degradable fraction of soybean meal, barley grain, alfalfa hay and corn silage (P<0.05). It was not observed significant differences between two methods for estimating the DEGRADABILITY rate of the feedstuffs except for forage feeds. But, high correlations were observed between two methods in the estimation of the potentially degradable fraction (r=0.72), rate of DEGRADABILITY (r=0.89), potential of DEGRADABILITY (r=0.98) and the effective DEGRADABILITY (P<0.01). The results showed that there were significant differences between two methods in the estimation of DEGRADABILITY parameters, but the observed high correlation coefficients for some DEGRADABILITY parameters could indicate the relative ability of the innovative method.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

ABDI BENMAR, HOSSEIN, & SOBHANI SENJABOD, ABDOLAH. (2015). COMPARISON OF IN VITRO AND IN SITU TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN SOME FEEDSTUFFS. RESEARCH ON ANIMAL PRODUCTION, 5(10), 98-112. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/241418/en

Vancouver: Copy

ABDI BENMAR HOSSEIN, SOBHANI SENJABOD ABDOLAH. COMPARISON OF IN VITRO AND IN SITU TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN SOME FEEDSTUFFS. RESEARCH ON ANIMAL PRODUCTION[Internet]. 2015;5(10):98-112. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/241418/en

IEEE: Copy

HOSSEIN ABDI BENMAR, and ABDOLAH SOBHANI SENJABOD, “COMPARISON OF IN VITRO AND IN SITU TECHNIQUES FOR ESTIMATING DRY MATTER DEGRADABILITY IN SOME FEEDSTUFFS,” RESEARCH ON ANIMAL PRODUCTION, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. 98–112, 2015, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/241418/en

Related Journal Papers