COMPARISON OF THREE CAVITATION MASS TRANSFER MODELS IN INTERNAL FLOWS THROUGH VENTURI AND ORIFICE

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

SARRESHTEDARI A.; Najafi V.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE TECHNOLOGY Year:2017 | Volume:3 | Issue:2 Page(s): 113-121

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

628

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF THREE CAVITATION MASS TRANSFER MODELS IN INTERNAL FLOWS THROUGH VENTURI AND ORIFICE

Author(s)

SARRESHTEDARI A. | Najafi V. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

CAVITATIONQ1

MASS TRANSFER MODELQ1

INTERNAL FLOWSQ1

Abstract

Three new MASS TRANSFER MODELs of CAVITATION have been studied in two cases of INTERNAL FLOWS, a venture and an orifice, numerically. Models were implemented in an open source code for similar condition flows. Volume of gas fraction, in some section of ventury conduit flow, and orifice discharge coefficient are compared to experimental data. Data comparisons shows high precisions in the results of Kunz and Zwart MASS TRANSFER MODELs, reached to average less than 5 percent in relative errors while Singhal model shows more deviation, more than 10 percent, from test data. Not any advantage is seems between Kunz and Zwart model in the results of case studies, while Singhal, with more flow parameters accounting, shows more diverted results, therefore more precisions is needed to use this model.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

SARRESHTEDARI, A., & Najafi, V.. (2017). COMPARISON OF THREE CAVITATION MASS TRANSFER MODELS IN INTERNAL FLOWS THROUGH VENTURI AND ORIFICE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE TECHNOLOGY, 3(2), 113-121. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/251930/en

Vancouver: Copy

SARRESHTEDARI A., Najafi V.. COMPARISON OF THREE CAVITATION MASS TRANSFER MODELS IN INTERNAL FLOWS THROUGH VENTURI AND ORIFICE. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2017;3(2):113-121. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/251930/en

IEEE: Copy

A. SARRESHTEDARI, and V. Najafi, “COMPARISON OF THREE CAVITATION MASS TRANSFER MODELS IN INTERNAL FLOWS THROUGH VENTURI AND ORIFICE,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MARINE TECHNOLOGY, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 113–121, 2017, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/251930/en

Related Journal Papers