EVALUATION OF BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY: THE WEIGHTED METHOD COMPARED TO THE COMPROMISE METHOD

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

CHANG C.L.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (IJEST) Year:2013 | Volume:10 | Issue:5 Page(s): 1051-1056

Download Full-Text

View:

289

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY: THE WEIGHTED METHOD COMPARED TO THE COMPROMISE METHOD

Author(s)

CHANG C.L. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

BASIN

ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY

MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS

THE COMPROMISE METHOD

THE WEIGHTED METHOD

Abstract

Environmental vulnerability analysis is an important issue in conducting sustainable BASIN management. In our past study, we developed a set of criteria from three categories of factors (geographic, hydrologic, and societal) for assessing BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY. According to a survey and the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) analysis, seven criteria were selected as a set of criteria, and the weights of these criteria were determined. This study adopts two different MULTIPLE CRITERIA ANALYSIS (MCA) methods, THE WEIGHTED METHOD and THE COMPROMISE METHOD, to integrate the criteria and evaluate the ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY of major BASINs in Taiwan. The results show that the Cho-Shui River BASIN has the highest ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY, no matter which method is used. However, the ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY of the Ta-Chia River BASIN is higher than that of the Tan-Shui River BASIN and the Tseng-Wen River BASIN when considering the measure of individual regret by the modified VIKOR method, which generates a different ranking than that of THE WEIGHTED METHOD. Stricter land-use restrictions should be placed on those BASINs that have higher ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY. According to the analysis, the results of BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY, land-use classification strategies can be created.

Cites

No record.

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

CHANG, C.L.. (2013). EVALUATION OF BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY: THE WEIGHTED METHOD COMPARED TO THE COMPROMISE METHOD. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (IJEST), 10(5), 1051-1056. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/285683/en

Vancouver: Copy

CHANG C.L.. EVALUATION OF BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY: THE WEIGHTED METHOD COMPARED TO THE COMPROMISE METHOD. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (IJEST)[Internet]. 2013;10(5):1051-1056. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/285683/en

IEEE: Copy

C.L. CHANG, “EVALUATION OF BASIN ENVIRONMENTAL VULNERABILITY: THE WEIGHTED METHOD COMPARED TO THE COMPROMISE METHOD,” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (IJEST), vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1051–1056, 2013, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/285683/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops