مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

666
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS MODELS, METHODS AND A CASE STUDY: RURAL RESEARCH CENTER

Pages

  84-90

Abstract

 The increasing competition for limited resources associated with the demand of policymakers, programmer and also utilisers for accountability forced the research institutes to show the quality and relevance of research results as well as asked over improvement. So, EVALUATION and progressive performance of research institutes are main concerns in developing countries. Although the traditional METHODS of EVALUATION have been criticized, much benefit achieved from. However, providing accurate and powerful MODELS and METHODS are necessary. In this study various approaches, MODELS and procedures were examined. It seems that in suitable conditions the participatory organization assessment introduced by ISNAR included a better ability and capacity comparing with others. Ozgediz EVALUATION model named CGIAR due to its comprehensive and measurable dimensions provides valid and accurate results. Therefore, the awareness and EVALUATION of 395 KEY INFORMANTs, including high and middle managers and senior experts of the ministry exposed to RURAL RESEARCH CENTER (RRC) was studied. EVALUATION was carried out based on a four dimensions model including; research results, quality and relevance, vision and strategic direction and management efficiency. General EVALUATION index of RRC shows a medium level that increases by education degree. Considering the high correlation between the views of respondents and that of their colleagues and superiors, the EVALUATION results can be generalized to a bigger population. There is a significant relation between the level of contact with RRC and positive EVALUATIONs.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    SHARIATI, M.T.. (2005). EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS MODELS, METHODS AND A CASE STUDY: RURAL RESEARCH CENTER. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, 18(3 (68 IN AGRONOMY AND HORTICULTURE)), 84-90. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/381203/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    SHARIATI M.T.. EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS MODELS, METHODS AND A CASE STUDY: RURAL RESEARCH CENTER. PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI[Internet]. 2005;18(3 (68 IN AGRONOMY AND HORTICULTURE)):84-90. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/381203/en

    IEEE: Copy

    M.T. SHARIATI, “EVALUATION OF RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS MODELS, METHODS AND A CASE STUDY: RURAL RESEARCH CENTER,” PAJOUHESH-VA-SAZANDEGI, vol. 18, no. 3 (68 IN AGRONOMY AND HORTICULTURE), pp. 84–90, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/381203/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button