مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

778
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

0
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

Selection of a subway excavation method using AHP and TOPSIS

Pages

  121-124

Abstract

 When a tunnel passes through weak soil with different conditions, or there is a thin layer of soil on top of the tunnel, the mass of soil or rock must be stabilized. In addition, an excavation method must be chosen and applied in order to control the amount of subsidence and convergence which are among the most significant factors in excavation a tunnel especially in urban area, since the soil between the tunnel and the ground moves due to changes in the shape of the tunnel through excavation, and progression of these movements toward the ground is manifested in subsidence of the surface structures. Therefore, in order to choose an excavation method based on the conditions of the project site, providing a decision-making model is essential. The ultimate goal is to select the most suitable subway tunnel excavation method among all available alternatives based on some determining criteria for Isfahan subway tunnel (Line 1). These criteria along with Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) models helped prioritize suitable alternatives. This model was designed based on technical, financial, executive, social, political and geo-mechanical features of the research site each of which subsumes a number of criteria. On the one hand, alternatives include Open Shield (full face) method, Slurry method, NATM method and excavate twin tunnel with TBM method which are used in the model. Finally, alternative D (excavate twin tunnel with TBM method) was selected as the best alternative of the site in both AHP(D=0. 225) and TOPSIS(D=0. 676391).

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    BAKHSHANDEH AMNIEH, HASSAN, Rostami, Amirhossein, Shahriar, Kurosh, Chakeri, Hamid, & CHERAGHI SEIFABAD, MASOUD. (2020). Selection of a subway excavation method using AHP and TOPSIS. GEOSCIENCES, 29(116 ), 121-124. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/402532/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    BAKHSHANDEH AMNIEH HASSAN, Rostami Amirhossein, Shahriar Kurosh, Chakeri Hamid, CHERAGHI SEIFABAD MASOUD. Selection of a subway excavation method using AHP and TOPSIS. GEOSCIENCES[Internet]. 2020;29(116 ):121-124. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/402532/en

    IEEE: Copy

    HASSAN BAKHSHANDEH AMNIEH, Amirhossein Rostami, Kurosh Shahriar, Hamid Chakeri, and MASOUD CHERAGHI SEIFABAD, “Selection of a subway excavation method using AHP and TOPSIS,” GEOSCIENCES, vol. 29, no. 116 , pp. 121–124, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/402532/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button