Information Journal Paper
APA:
CopyPARRAMON, F., GARCIA, CH., GAMBUS, P., VILAPLANA, J., ARAGONES, N., & VILLALONGA, A.. (2003). POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IS MORE EFFECTIVE WITH EPIDURAL METHADONE THAN WITH INTRAVENOUS METHADONE IN THORACIC SURGERY. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, 50(7), 326-331. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/554603/en
Vancouver:
CopyPARRAMON F., GARCIA CH., GAMBUS P., VILAPLANA J., ARAGONES N., VILLALONGA A.. POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IS MORE EFFECTIVE WITH EPIDURAL METHADONE THAN WITH INTRAVENOUS METHADONE IN THORACIC SURGERY. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION[Internet]. 2003;50(7):326-331. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/554603/en
IEEE:
CopyF. PARRAMON, CH. GARCIA, P. GAMBUS, J. VILAPLANA, N. ARAGONES, and A. VILLALONGA, “POSTOPERATIVE PATIENT-CONTROLLED ANALGESIA IS MORE EFFECTIVE WITH EPIDURAL METHADONE THAN WITH INTRAVENOUS METHADONE IN THORACIC SURGERY,” REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA Y REANIMACION, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 326–331, 2003, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/554603/en