LAPAROSCOPIC MESH VERSUS OPEN PREPERITONEAL MESH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL (SCUR HERNIA REPAIR STUDY)

JOHANSSON, B., HALLERBACK, B., GLISE, H., ANESTEN, B., SMEDBERG, S., & ROMAN, J.. (1999). LAPAROSCOPIC MESH VERSUS OPEN PREPERITONEAL MESH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL (SCUR HERNIA REPAIR STUDY). ANNALS OF SURGERY, 230(2), 225-231. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/584177/en

JOHANSSON B., HALLERBACK B., GLISE H., ANESTEN B., SMEDBERG S., ROMAN J.. LAPAROSCOPIC MESH VERSUS OPEN PREPERITONEAL MESH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL (SCUR HERNIA REPAIR STUDY). ANNALS OF SURGERY[Internet]. 1999;230(2):225-231. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/584177/en

B. JOHANSSON, B. HALLERBACK, H. GLISE, B. ANESTEN, S. SMEDBERG, and J. ROMAN, “LAPAROSCOPIC MESH VERSUS OPEN PREPERITONEAL MESH VERSUS CONVENTIONAL TECHNIQUE FOR INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: A RANDOMIZED MULTICENTER TRIAL (SCUR HERNIA REPAIR STUDY),” ANNALS OF SURGERY, vol. 230, no. 2, pp. 225–231, 1999, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/584177/en