Information Journal Paper
APA:
CopyCALISKAN, E., BODUR, H., OZEREN, S., CORAKCI, A., OZKAN, S., & YUCESOY, I.. (2005). MISOPROSTOL 50 MICROG SUBLINGUALLY VERSUS VAGINALLY FOR LABOR INDUCTION AT TERM: A RANDOMIZED STUDY. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 59(3), 155-161. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/584179/en
Vancouver:
CopyCALISKAN E., BODUR H., OZEREN S., CORAKCI A., OZKAN S., YUCESOY I.. MISOPROSTOL 50 MICROG SUBLINGUALLY VERSUS VAGINALLY FOR LABOR INDUCTION AT TERM: A RANDOMIZED STUDY. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION[Internet]. 2005;59(3):155-161. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/584179/en
IEEE:
CopyE. CALISKAN, H. BODUR, S. OZEREN, A. CORAKCI, S. OZKAN, and I. YUCESOY, “MISOPROSTOL 50 MICROG SUBLINGUALLY VERSUS VAGINALLY FOR LABOR INDUCTION AT TERM: A RANDOMIZED STUDY,” GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 155–161, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/584179/en