Information Journal Paper
APA:
CopyVALENTIN, L., AMEYE, L., JURKOVIC, D., METZGER, U., LECURU, F., & VAN, H.S.. (2006). WHICH EXTRAUTERINE PELVIC MASSES ARE DIFFICULT TO CORRECTLY CLASSIFY AS BENIGN OR MALIGNANT ON THE BASIS OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND IS THERE A WAY OF MAKING A CORRECT DIAGNOSIS?. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGY, 27(4), 438-444. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/587702/en
Vancouver:
CopyVALENTIN L., AMEYE L., JURKOVIC D., METZGER U., LECURU F., VAN H.S.. WHICH EXTRAUTERINE PELVIC MASSES ARE DIFFICULT TO CORRECTLY CLASSIFY AS BENIGN OR MALIGNANT ON THE BASIS OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND IS THERE A WAY OF MAKING A CORRECT DIAGNOSIS?. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGY[Internet]. 2006;27(4):438-444. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/587702/en
IEEE:
CopyL. VALENTIN, L. AMEYE, D. JURKOVIC, U. METZGER, F. LECURU, and H.S. VAN, “WHICH EXTRAUTERINE PELVIC MASSES ARE DIFFICULT TO CORRECTLY CLASSIFY AS BENIGN OR MALIGNANT ON THE BASIS OF ULTRASOUND FINDINGS AND IS THERE A WAY OF MAKING A CORRECT DIAGNOSIS?,” ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRIC AND GYNECOLOGY, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 438–444, 2006, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/587702/en