IS COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS PREFERRED TO SEVERITY OF DISEASE AS THE MAIN GUIDING PRINCIPLE IN PRIORITY SETTING IN RESOURCE POOR SETTING? THE CASE OF UGANDA

KAPIRIRI, L., ARNSEN, T.M., & NORHEIM, F.. (2004). IS COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS PREFERRED TO SEVERITY OF DISEASE AS THE MAIN GUIDING PRINCIPLE IN PRIORITY SETTING IN RESOURCE POOR SETTING? THE CASE OF UGANDA. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2(-), 1-1. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/605281/en

KAPIRIRI L., ARNSEN T.M., NORHEIM F.. IS COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS PREFERRED TO SEVERITY OF DISEASE AS THE MAIN GUIDING PRINCIPLE IN PRIORITY SETTING IN RESOURCE POOR SETTING? THE CASE OF UGANDA. COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION[Internet]. 2004;2(-):1-1. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/605281/en

L. KAPIRIRI, T.M. ARNSEN, and F. NORHEIM, “IS COSTEFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS PREFERRED TO SEVERITY OF DISEASE AS THE MAIN GUIDING PRINCIPLE IN PRIORITY SETTING IN RESOURCE POOR SETTING? THE CASE OF UGANDA,” COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, vol. 2, no. -, pp. 1–1, 2004, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/605281/en