مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Verion

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

video

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

sound

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Persian Version

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

View:

607
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Download:

179
مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

THE COMPARISON OF THE AMOUNT OF METHIONINE SUPPLY BY DIFFERENT RUMEN-PROTECTED METHIONINE SOURCES

Pages

  1773-1780

Abstract

 Bioavailability of three rumen protected METHIONINE (Met) sources with different protection methods (Mepron® M85, Evonik Industries, Germany; Methioplus®, Soda Nutrition, Italy and Methilock®, Tehrandaneh Co. Iran) were evaluated in 2 experiments with 6 canulated non-lactating HOLSTEIN COWs. In experiment 1, the ruminalin situ and mobile bag techniques were used for assessing RUMINAL DEGRADABILITY and intestinal digestibility of Met from the protected Met sources. The rate of disappearance of Met from Mepron® M85 was lower than Methioplus® (2.94 vs.5.73 % h-1). Mepron® M85 had more resistance to ruminal degradation than Methioplus® (82.78 vs.68.51%), but the higher intestinal digestibility of Methioplus® resulted in similar amounts of available Met for two products. Because of high washing out loss fromin situ bags, ruminal degradation was not estimated for Methilock®. In the second experiment, Met availability was assayed by the blood Met response after 5 days feeding each product in comparison to pretreatment levels utilizing a 3×3 Latin square design. Three Met sources increased blood Met concentration significantly after 5 days feeding (37.5, 52.23 and 44.39% for Methilock®, Mepron® and Methioplus® respectively). Results of the present study showed that the three RPM sources increased blood Met concentration. This study also suggests that thein situ method may not adequately characterize the availability of rumen protected amino acids, especially those of small particle size.

Cites

  • No record.
  • References

  • No record.
  • Cite

    APA: Copy

    ABDI BENEMAR, H., DEHGHAN BANADAKY, M., REZAYAZDI, K., & ABDOLLAHI, Y.. (2016). THE COMPARISON OF THE AMOUNT OF METHIONINE SUPPLY BY DIFFERENT RUMEN-PROTECTED METHIONINE SOURCES. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), 18(SUPP.), 1773-1780. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/62970/en

    Vancouver: Copy

    ABDI BENEMAR H., DEHGHAN BANADAKY M., REZAYAZDI K., ABDOLLAHI Y.. THE COMPARISON OF THE AMOUNT OF METHIONINE SUPPLY BY DIFFERENT RUMEN-PROTECTED METHIONINE SOURCES. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST)[Internet]. 2016;18(SUPP.):1773-1780. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/62970/en

    IEEE: Copy

    H. ABDI BENEMAR, M. DEHGHAN BANADAKY, K. REZAYAZDI, and Y. ABDOLLAHI, “THE COMPARISON OF THE AMOUNT OF METHIONINE SUPPLY BY DIFFERENT RUMEN-PROTECTED METHIONINE SOURCES,” JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (JAST), vol. 18, no. SUPP., pp. 1773–1780, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/62970/en

    Related Journal Papers

    Related Seminar Papers

  • No record.
  • Related Plans

  • No record.
  • Recommended Workshops






    Move to top
    telegram sharing button
    whatsapp sharing button
    linkedin sharing button
    twitter sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    email sharing button
    sharethis sharing button