COMPARISON OF TWO LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CROCIN IN THE SAFFRON AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES USING UV- VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETRY

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

HEYDARI SOMAYEH

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering Year:2018 | Volume:37 | Issue:1 Page(s): 99-108

Download Full-Text

View:

453

Download:

276

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

COMPARISON OF TWO LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CROCIN IN THE SAFFRON AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES USING UV- VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETRY

Author(s)

HEYDARI SOMAYEH | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION

DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION BASED ON SOLIDIFICATION OF FLOATING ORGANIC DROP

CROCIN

SAFFRON

BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES

Abstract

In this work, two approaches based on DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION (DLLME) and DISPERSIVE LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTION based on Solidification of Floating Organic Drop (DLLME-SFO) were compared for the extraction and preconcentration of CROCIN from SAFFRON and BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES. Different DLLME and DLLME-SFO parameters influencing the extraction efficiency were studied and optimized. The results showed that both extraction methods exhibited good linearity, precision, enrichment factor, and detection limit. Under optimal conditions, the limits of detection were 0.008 and 0.005 ng/mL for DLLME and DLLME-SFO, respectively. The preconcentration factors were 88 and 95 for DLLME and DLLME-SFO, respectively. The applicability of the proposed methods was examined by analyzing CROCIN in SAFFRON, urine and milk samples and good results were obtained. The percentage recovery values for spiked samples were between 96.4 and 99.1.

Cites

No record.

References

Cite

APA: Copy

HEYDARI, SOMAYEH. (2018). COMPARISON OF TWO LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CROCIN IN THE SAFFRON AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES USING UV- VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETRY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (IJCCE), 37(1), 99-108. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/714286/en

Vancouver: Copy

HEYDARI SOMAYEH. COMPARISON OF TWO LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CROCIN IN THE SAFFRON AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES USING UV- VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETRY. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (IJCCE)[Internet]. 2018;37(1):99-108. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/714286/en

IEEE: Copy

SOMAYEH HEYDARI, “COMPARISON OF TWO LIQUID-LIQUID MICROEXTRACTIONS FOR THE DETECTION OF CROCIN IN THE SAFFRON AND BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES USING UV- VIS SPECTROPHOTOMETRY,” IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY AND CHEMICAL ENGINEERING (IJCCE), vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 99–108, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/714286/en

Related Journal Papers

No record.

Related Seminar Papers

No record.

Related Plans

No record.

Recommended Workshops