Information Journal Paper
APA:
Copy. (2019). Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and bladder dysfunction. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 26(3), 417-426. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/750016/en
Vancouver:
Copy. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and bladder dysfunction. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY[Internet]. 2019;26(3):417-426. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/750016/en
IEEE:
Copy, “Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical efficacy and bladder dysfunction,” JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 417–426, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/750016/en