A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BARRIERS ON NOISE POLLUTION REDUCTION

Q: How can I download an article?

To download an article from SID, first log in to the site, search for the article title, and click on the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I download an ISI article?

To download an ISI article on SID, enter the keyword or article title in the search bar, view the relevant results, click on the desired article, and select the 'Download Article' option.

Q: How can I access the SID database?

To access the SID database, visit SID.ir, create an account, and log in to access scientific resources.

Q: Is downloading articles from SID free?

Some articles on SID are available for free, while others require payment. Details are specified on the article's page.

FATHI NAJAFABADI L.; ESMAEILI SARI A.; GHASSEMPOORI M.

مرکز اطلاعات علمی Scientific Information Database (SID) - Trusted Source for Research and Academic Resources

Journal Paper

Paper Information

Journal: JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Year:2007 | Volume:9 | Issue:1 (32) Page(s): 79-86

Download Full-Text

Persian Verion

View:

1,200

Download:

Cites:

Information Journal Paper

Title

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BARRIERS ON NOISE POLLUTION REDUCTION

Author(s)

FATHI NAJAFABADI L. | ESMAEILI SARI A. | GHASSEMPOORI M. | Issue Writer Certificate

Keywords

NOISE POLLUTIONQ3

NOISE BARRIERSQ4

EQUIVALENT SOUND LEVELQ2

NOUR FOREST PARKQ3

Abstract

In this study, 5 stations were selected and the amount of sound reduction by biological and physical barriers were measured and compared to that of the control station. These barriers consisted of broad leaves cover, evergreen cover, plain wall, porous wall, and fences with vegetation cover. The control station was a field without any barriers. The results of the vstudy showed that the plain wall was the most effective and the porous wall was the least effective barrier for the insertion loss. Moreover, it turned out that to have the standard sound level, the distance from the road should be 80 meters for the control station and the porous wall, 40 meters for the plain wall, and 60 meters for the other types of barriers.

Cites

THE ROLE OF TREES IN ABSORPTION, CONTROL AND REDUCTION OF ACOUSTIC POLLUTION "BASED ON A SCIENTIFIC COMMENTARY OF THE FOURTH VERSE OF MUNAFIQUN SURAH"

References

No record.

Cite

APA: Copy

FATHI NAJAFABADI, L., ESMAEILI SARI, A., & GHASSEMPOORI, M.. (2007). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BARRIERS ON NOISE POLLUTION REDUCTION. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 9(1 (32)), 79-86. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/86952/en

Vancouver: Copy

FATHI NAJAFABADI L., ESMAEILI SARI A., GHASSEMPOORI M.. A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BARRIERS ON NOISE POLLUTION REDUCTION. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY[Internet]. 2007;9(1 (32)):79-86. Available from: https://sid.ir/paper/86952/en

IEEE: Copy

L. FATHI NAJAFABADI, A. ESMAEILI SARI, and M. GHASSEMPOORI, “A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECT OF PHYSICAL AND BIOLOGICAL BARRIERS ON NOISE POLLUTION REDUCTION,” JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, vol. 9, no. 1 (32), pp. 79–86, 2007, [Online]. Available: https://sid.ir/paper/86952/en

Related Journal Papers