Introduction: The ethical dimensions of agriculture need to be explored, distinguishing between ethics in agriculture and ethics of agriculture. Ethics in agriculture is traditionally based on abstract moral theory, formulated through logical reasoning, but often found inadequate to address the complex ethical challenges within agriculture due to its abstract nature and lack of practical visibility. Conversely, ethics of agriculture is approached within a context-specific framework derived from the research topic with the aim of providing more tailored solutions. Materials and Methods: A comprehensive review of the relevant literature is conducted, using a descriptive-analytical approach to provide a conceptual framework for understanding agricultural ethics. Conclusion: The article highlights the critical need for a comprehensive ethical framework to address the multifaceted ethical challenges in the agricultural sector. The importance of analyzing and resolving ethical dilemmas at all stages of agriculture is underscored in order to align practices with human ideals and to ensure ethical decision-making by stakeholders involved in agriculture.

In the epoch marked by the primary characteristics of numerous changes and rapid transformations, there is also a need to expedite the process of making decisions. During these times, managers must choose the best way to cover various subjects in the least amount of time. Information must be the basis of these decisions, but the boundless quantities of mass information may mislead us and cause us to analyze the information as an obstructive element, or inaccurate information may lead us to the creation of a faulty policy. By defining the applicable criteria and quantifying the qualities of various aspects of work may help us considerably in understanding our problems, determining our goals, and selecting the best methods to reach those goals. Thus, paying attention to these elements of decision - making is very important and can be a very useful tool in successful policy - making.

Each of the commentators of the Holy Quran has interpreted it so that great variation in their interpretative books and their writings has occurred. Now the question is that to what extent this variation is permissible and how much it can be extended? Given to the semantic distinction between interpretive approaches and trends that will be discussed, it seems that the development of interpretive trends is more possible than interpretive methods. Commentators have had much speech in this field and have created considerable diversity in the interpretive writings. It can also be said that the range of variation depends on the needs and scientific findings of commentators and regarding interpretive rules. This article has provided a new vision in the field of interpretive trends and necessity of separation between methods and attitudes.

Bioethics consists of human conducts that directly and particularly relate to the application of technology in his natural life. Technologies of this kind are distinguished under the title of biotechnology. Biotechnology has indirectly changed the human life through changes made in animal and vegetable lives, while directly affecting his own life too. Therefore, the moral evaluation of biotechnology is very important since the moral perspective is fundamental in light of which other perspectives, such as religious and legal ones, could be interpreted or determined. All aspects of human life – before birth, during his life and after death – fall within the scope of bioethics. These aspects include subject matters such as “infertility treatment”, “abortion”, “organ transplantation”, “human cloning”, “research on human beings”, “vegetable genetic modification”, “animal genetic manipulation”, “concept and criteria of death” and “euthanasia”. In this paper we deal with the scope of bioethics by introducing and analyzing the problems that dominate this field, present and evaluate contending viewpoints in this field, and put forth solutions for a precise approach for the analysis of the problems. Approach to bioethical problems needs to be both free of dogmatism and holistic. Moreover, it is proposed that moral judgements in this field, be presented within a justifiable moral theory whose bases are established at the meta-ethical level, in a clear, sufficient and consistent way.

The beginning of any research depends on knowing the place of that research in the system of human knowledge. In other words, the researcher needs to know in what field of sciences and knowledge the subject he / she is researching. Ethical research is no exception. The researcher of ethics, before doing anything in his research, recognizes his field of research and organizes his research path in that field. In this article, by analyzing the researches done in this field, the geography of ethical researches has been studied and while an analytical and explanatory effort of ethical researches has been made, it has introduced seven areas for these researches. The generalities of ethics, normative ethics, meta-ethics, descriptive ethics, ethical psychology, Moral education and sociology of ethics are these seven areas.

Welcome to the Journal Research in Clinical Medicine, Volume 8. 2020 marks a milestone in the history of this journal because it comes with some profound enhancements. The first and the most important change in our journal was that we eliminated the obligation made by the word “ analytical” in the title and scope of our journal in attracting the articles. Moreover, by our new way of continuous publishing, fast publication of research papers is possible without delay....