The historical literature of us demonstrates not only the absence of association in narrative setting but also incapacity of their historical role. As a result of that, men have been recorded their history. In other hand, women historiography is regarded to be male history. It has been seemed that the most important reason of this ignorance is the lack of participation of Muslim's women in social role notably in science fields. The reasons which made their social scientific role less important are variant. It has been believed that maternity substantially in essence of physiology and psychology structure of women. Subsequently, they miss the opportunity to rival with men in scientific and social fields due to this aspect. On the other side, it could not be denied the effect of other factors such as underestimation of women, pioneering of men in fields of conquest of lands and subsequently discovery and transferring the scientific achievements of other nations and also translating and completing of them, Islamic rationality outdoor retreat and layer deposition realistic ideas from Hadith's approach, the dominance of patriarchal thinking in the arena of family and society and followed by rise of political despotism instead of pontificated system based on divine legitimation and popularity, substitution of conflicts and sectarian and ethnic wars instead of Islamic tolerance, effectiveness of traditions and thoughts of Arab conflict ignorant life, Buddism, Jewish and Manichaen and finally, changing attitude of religious scholars and Islamic societies into Muslim's position. All of these have been influence on weakness of the role of social and scientific of women. The approach of this essay is a combination based on mentioned reasons and other earthly ones.